Housing plan gets nod over business venture

Published 10:55am Tuesday, May 22, 2012

After the Fergus Falls City Council’s landmark decision May 7 to move toward demolition of most of the city’s Kirkbride building, the council focused on three smaller-scale Regional Treatment Center issues at its Monday night meeting.

 

Parcel D4

After months of delays and deliberation, the council finally picked a local developer to move forward with on the sale of six houses on the RTC property near the Union/Fir avenue intersection. However, the decision only came after a rare divided council vote.

Ultimately, the council went with the residential-focused option from Cory Budke and Marc Sikkink over the business development plan proposed by affiliates of The Business Network Fergus Falls. Before the decision, many council members acknowledged that both proposals were very good.

“I don’t think either one would be a mistake to go with, and quite honestly I’m torn between the two,” said Eric Shelstad.

Ultimately, the council members (besides the abstaining Jay Cichosz, whose name is mentioned on The Business Network’s website) were forced to decide between the job-creating potential of the business proposal or the more “sure thing” status of the Budke-Sikkink plan, which included definite timelines and a promise to pay the city if its timelines aren’t met. Alderman Randy Synstelien moved for the first vote, which would have moved forward with The Business Network’s option.

“There’s potential for some job creation here and that’s an important part that we can’t overlook,” he said.

However, the vote failed, with Randy and Stan Synstelien and Pat Connelly voting in favor and Shelstad, Scott Rachels, Jim Fish and JoEllen Thacker voting against.

“I ended up giving higher marks to the Budke-Sikkink one because I like (definition),” said Thacker. “I know what I’m getting with that one.”

After the first vote failed, Stan Synstelien said the Budke-Sikkink plan was also acceptable to the city, and the council voted 7-0 in favor of it. City staff will begin working with the developers on a purchase agreement.

 

Grant extension

Special advisor on the RTC Kent Mattson updated the council on negotiations with the state Department of Administration to extend the city’s demolition grant deadline agreement to December 2014, rather than just under a year from now. While that language appears to be a sure bet, Mattson said other negotiations are delaying the process.

“Where we have been negotiating with the state and the reason why the agreement is not finalized relates to exploring the extent to which the bond funds can be used for renovation or stabilization,” he said.

If the state agrees to allowing some renovation funding, leftover funds could be used to renovate the part of the Kirkbride left standing should the city decide to tear some of it down. The city is hoping for an open-ended definition of “renovation,” while the state is looking for a more specific listing of what kinds of renovation could be made. Mattson will give an update at the June 4 council meeting.

 

Marketing task force

Finally, the city approved a task force committee recommended by the Historic Preservation Commission to explore options for successfully marketing the RTC to developers. The committee will look at a variety of options to determine the best party or firm to successfully reach interested developers, potentially preventing the demolition of the Kirkbride. The committee’s first meeting is today at 4:30 p.m. and is open to the public.

Members include Pat Connelly, Tim Hunt, Laurie Mullen, Anthony Hicks, Tim Litt, Steve Guttormson, Jake Krohn, Michelle Anderson, Wayne Hurley, and HPC members Walt Dunlap, Rob Rogholt, Jay Neumann, Jan Stenger, Jan Nelson, Mark Sundberg, Chris Schuelke, and Lance Albers.

 

Daily Journal

The city council chamber was fuller than usual, but the Friends of the Kirkbride could not pull off a repeat performance of the May 7 council meeting, where more than 200 packed the council chambers and flowed out the back door.

On Monday, about 50 sat in on the meeting. Although several were at the meeting for reasons not pertaining to the Kirkbride’s preservation, many attendees were still festooned with the Friends’ buttons. The crowd was also silent on Monday, a far cry from the crowd that often murmured, muttered and occasionally shouted during the May 7 meeting.

The city was more prepared for the crowd this time around, setting up several chairs and a TV with a live feed of the meeting in the main foyer area of city hall. However, the area went unused, as all attendees could fit in the chambers.

“We expected less because of what happened last (meeting because) they were not very accommodating,” said Maxine Schmidt, one of the Friends organizers. She said several people told her they would not be attending again if it meant having to stand outside, as some Kirkbride supporters were forced to do May 7.

Schmidt said there were signs of positive movement on the RTC at Monday’s meeting, particularly the progress on extending the demolition grant agreement. However, she noted that the Friends group prefer that the city not sell Parcel D4 of the property, as some developers had previously expressed interest in the land along with the rest of the Kirkbride.

Tags:
  1. t.j. johnson

    i would like to know what the winning bid was. I think the people of the city has that right to know.

  2. mike erickson

    Ryan, you stated that we could not pull off over 200 people again. For your information there were people there that were older that needed seating. Did they get it? no. There was people who were invited to come and shunned, not given the chance to speak at the meeting. How do you think they feel? I would be pretty sure pretty angry about it. Would you sit out there for nothing after being asked to give your input? No you wouldn’t. If the council would accomodate the people in Fergus Falls a lot better instead of “what council wants the council gets” it would be a different story on people going to the meetings. I hate to say this but you have no idea what “friends of the Kirkbride” are capable of yet. Do you really want to see people show up at the meetings only to be shot down by council and get uptight and cause problems in council chambers? Mainly the comments made there twards the citizens are what have people fired up. Like telling them you are better than them because you are on the council. Jay made this comment and does have several people waiting for him to slip up to get him. People take offense to that in a very big way. He made it so let him deal with it. People have already made comments about running city hall to be heard. Do you or the council want to be held responsable for that? Riot mentality, someone getting hurt cuz people are coming down to the wire? I would bet not. Never underestimate the public at large like that for you have no idea what they can do to you. I am NOT making threats just telling it how it is when people are treated like this.

  3. mike erickson

    Edward, to make this perfectly clear. These statements are NOT coming from “friends of the Kirkbride” that i am aware of. I know several people are voicing their anger about the coucil and how they have been treated from the council.

  4. mike erickson

    So what your saying Edward is that even though the people who live in the city that fill out the cards to voice their opinion in front of the council shouldn’t be allowed to speak? It is them who got these people into their chairs as councilmen. They are there to represent the people of Fergus Falls, do what is best. When they openly invite them there and shut them down, i disagree with that. As a council member myself we would be asked to resign if we treated people like that in an open meeting. We (friends of the Kirkbride) did NOT put anyone up to stirring the pot and getting out of hand. The people that were getting agitated were on their own with that. Yes there is a difference between f.o.k. and the supporters that were there.

  5. Julie Wangler

    I am not sure who these spoiled Friends of the Kirkbride are who you are referring too?? Every and I mean every last friend I have met or come across have been nothing but kind and have huge hearts. I believe what you are mistaking as spoiled is what we call passion.

    “One person with passion is better than forty people merely interested.”

    We all need to remain united and avoid throwing mud at each other. We are all human and need to remember everyone has feelings, we are not put on this earth to judge..it isn’t our place.

  6. Jerome Mullins

    Correction: I meant “off putting to people WHO BELIEVE in more civil discourse” in my immediately recent post.

    JMM

  7. mike erickson

    First off to Edward Nigma, and John Doe. I have never once badmouthed anyone on here or on Facebook. If i have pointed the finger at someone they have it coming. I have also NEVER threatend anyone on here, just stated facts. If that offends you well then that is too bad. You know that as well as i do. Yes i do point fingers, there is nothing wrong with that. As far as being at the meetings yes i have been there and also seen them on peg access. You both seem to like pointing the finger my way on the insults, naming, ect.. What have you done here on this column? Nothing but badger myself and the f.o.k., and yet it is my/our fault. As both of you figured out i don’t take someone pushing me. Maybe thats why you see me as a threat cuz you can’t bully me and i don’t run when called names. John Doe, what a great name. I use my real name on this forum. I will post my info when you 2 post your real names. Yes i will check the names to make sure they are right. Obviously you have more to hide than i do! I’m not scared, i don’t need to hide behind a screen to do things. Why should i do your homework for you? You have a copmputer, do the homework yourself. Like i said i have NEVER layed threats out there, so show me where you base this from, for there isn’t any. I can say this if you think i am a straight forward person i would love to hear you speak to the mayor. Maybe take your time, money, ect. and come and sit in our meetings and see how ours are run.

  8. mike erickson

    Edward, if you did call them you would also know what town i am from. As far as your petty finger pointing i would start by pointing to you. I did state i would tell you if you guys reveil your real names. I am holding my end. You are the ones that are scared to provide information. What does my work have to do with anything? Last i did know it wasn’t a standard to look a certain way. As far as me coming straight from work (taking time off) that is my concern). You should understand that you harvard graduate! You seem to know everything so why aren’t you on the board? As far as going away? Highly doubtful. I am free to go wherever i please. This only shows your not what you claim to be. Me a fraud? Doubtful, you are the fraud. I know what i am about, i call it as it is. Can you honestly sit there and say you do? Of course not, your a tough guy living in fantasy land in front of your computer.

  9. Julie Wangler

    Did a google search and within 2 min I knew which town Mike Erickson represents. Just sayin…

  10. Julie Wangler

    Oh and are we all grown ups?? Cuz its starting to sound like a grade school playground. Just my opinion.

Editor's Picks

Rothsay says ‘yes’ to new school [UPDATED]

Supporters of a new school in Rothsay have reason to celebrate this morning. Despite divided opinion and a referendum that failed by 12 votes in ... Read more  | 3 comments

High school artwork on display at Blondeau Festival

It’s the time of the year at Kennedy Secondary School when students finish their last tests and papers before the summer break. But on Monday, ... Read more

Race track opens, Shriners in town this weekend

Rev up your engines. Friday evening is the season opener for the I-94 Speedway races. The speedway is fun for the whole family as racers ... Read more