Archived Story

Vote no on bond referendum

Published 7:10am Monday, April 1, 2013 Updated 9:14am Monday, April 1, 2013

I write to support the recent opinion letters against the bond referendum for new athletic facilities.

It is outrageous that the school board and administration are forcing this matter to a vote within just a few months after we defeated the matter in the November election.

They are acting like two year olds who refuse to abide by their parents’ “No you can’t” and going ahead and doing whatever they like.

Do you remember the time we were asked to come up with a name for an ice arena most of us did not want? If this bond issues passes, it will be easy to name the new facilities, “The field of Schemes,” for that is an apt description of the attacks these autocrats are mounting against the taxpayers of our community.

Vote no against this outrage.

 

Camilla Ryan

Fergus Falls

  • Elliot Dallavalle

    Camilla, if we name the new athletic field “Jesus’s Athletic Complex of Fergus Falls” would you vote for it?

    • J Mullins

      No doubt you would prefer a title of “Karl Marx Grounds for Indoctrinating Socialist Revolutionary Children to Enact Utopia on Earth”, with heroic scale statues of such Socialist gods as Marx, Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Castro, Clinton, 0bama?

      • Richard Olson

        Silly me. I didn’t even know Karl Marx played baseball. Thanks for the info Jerome.

      • Elliot Dallavalle

        Come on Jerome. Don’t be an example of how the MN educational system has failed.

        • J Mullins

          Amazing!! A big government , cradle to grave welfare mongering socialist who will actually admit that the MN public education system has failed? What were you smoking when you wrote that ,alias Elliot?

          • Richard Olson

            There you go again Jerome, making stuff up just to appear stupid. Elliot has made about 6 or 7 comments here and you already know he’s a “cradle to grave welfare mongering socialist” or is it just possible that once again you are going off on another conspiracy laced tangent where anyone who refuses to pet your inflated ego is a Socialist.

            Just because Elliot pegged you as an example of public school system failure does not mean he is condemning the entire system. For every example like you there is an opposite
            example like me. A well rounded, Liberal intellectual that can read and write, compose coherent thoughts then reduce those thoughts to writing. A broadminded free thinker who knows the difference between your comments and bird droppings ( it’s a skill requiring a keen eye)

            Perhaps you would care to argue the very public failings of students home schooled and forced to watch the 700 club during recess. As I recall a few of them went on to garner a few national headlines indicating that they were not at the top of their class (of three).

          • Elliot Dallavalle

            Jerome – Wow! That is pretty harsh there buddy? I suspect my comment went right over your head so take a look at Richard’s for more of a hint. By the way, since you are so far out in right field, I suppose we should make you our right fielder. We’ll call you in when the game’s over.

          • holly

            “A well rounded, Liberal intellectual that can read and write, compose coherent thoughts then reduce those thoughts to writing. A broadminded free thinker …”

            Haha, that’s funny, RO. You certainly are a legend in your own (small) mind. In reality, you are a hateful troll, spewing your hate and bigotry here and elsewhere upon anyone who thinks differently than you do. It continues to ooze out of you like pus from a festering boil.

          • Richard Olson

            The comments to any article are never complete until Holly arrives late and covers everything with her special layer of poop.

    • Swede

      “if we name the new athletic field “Jesus’s Athletic Complex of Fergus Falls” would you vote for it?”

      I would donate money to that. I also would want a large cross displayed. Because tax money is wasted on children’s hobbies and adult pastimes, I think a display of morality is educational and of value to society.

      • Richard Olson

        Why don’t you apply for a grant from the Taliban, I hear they’re into the same stuff.

        • Swede

          Richard, the Taliban want to enforce their views through law, known as sharia law; I have not heard this discussed among local Christians.

          Because I believe in free market capitalism, I offered to donate money to support Elliot Dallavalle’s idea.

          Nazi’s and other hard-leftists reject Christianity. They would rather confiscate earned wealth of residents than accept such a display.

          • Richard Olson

            Apparently it has conveniently slipped your mind that you and yours lost (big time) that crap about Nazi’s being leftists” a month ago. That’s Ok Mike, I still have a copy, because I knew we couldn’t trust you to remember. You’ve not heard about Christians wanting to impose their views through laws??????????

            Who do you think you’re talking to? A gathering of tea baggers? Just who’s views do you think the evangelical zealots are pushing to be made law in the abortion issue, or school prayer, or who one can marry. You’re sounding more frootloops then Jerome or even Merle Hexum.

          • Swede

            Wow, Richard is my first stalker.
            Centrally planned government, be it socialist or another form of tyranny, is left wing. A representative republic is centrist. Having no government, or anarchy (which does not last), is right wing.

            Is there any right more sacred than the right to life?
            What is wrong with allowing school prayer?
            Richard, sorry if the state will not allow you to marry your sister, but there are logical reasons for marriage laws.

          • Richard Olson

            I just love it when you professed Christians show your Christian values by accusing others of incest and other crimes without proof. I can see how much that stuff about bearing false witness means to you. Your belligerent faith is certainly nothing I would want my children exposed to, nor should your phony values ever be taught to impressionable children in any school.

      • Elliot Dallavalle

        Mike – I suppose you would like the cross to be set on fire after every football game too right? After all that is a display of morality and of educational value to society, isn’t it?

        • Swede

          Perhaps to a Nazi, or other radical leftist it would be, but now I must disagree with you Elliot. If your intention is to burn crosses, I will pray for your repentance. I intend to promote Christian morals.

          • Elliot Dallavalle

            Well Mike, I see you went over the edge with your comment. Calling me a Nazi? Oh well, I served in the military defending this country so you can have the freedom to use your “first amendment” rights. It’s comments like this that makes me consider whether those years were wrongly justified.

            Perhaps you would prefer in lieu of erecting a cross, a “burning bush” instead. Fits right into your religious agenda and it would look good in the eyes of your god, on that inevitable day, when he/she inquires about your hatred and animosity toward his other children, you know, being christian and all. It’s not my repentence you should be praying for.

          • Phaedrus

            That’s interesting Swede. So what, specifically, are these Christian values you intend to promote (keeping in mind that vagu general references like “family values” are meaningless unless you can specifically spell out those values individually)? And what, specifically, is it that makes them “christian”, as opposed to Greek or Buddist or even other secular moral values (particularly if the christian position agrees with those other positions)?

            And the fact that you and Jerome can’t distinguish socialism from communism from fascism/Nazism doesn’t mean you’re right, it means that one should be suspicious of anything you say about politics and economics (because your clearly wrong). Why don’t you try actually taking a class on the subject? It’s pretty clear that the information you’re getting for free on TV and AM-Radio is worth what you’re paying for it.

  • doctipster

    Lucky, had I been in town and remembered that the vote was today we could have had two more votes against this atrocity. Both My wife and I forgot that the bond was yesteday.

    In hindsight, The school really tried to do a number on sneaking this one in. Not only was it on a non election date, but then they switched polling places at the last minute to further confuse people. thank you taxpayers of FF residents, I sincerely applaud this effort to defeat the wasteful spending of our school district.

    SUPPORT OUR CHILDREN

    DENY THE WASTEFUL SPENDING

    At some point the FF school district will have to realize that this wasteful spending is no longer going to fly. You are right, the 33.5 Million dollar band aide, that ended up costing us far more, and the hockey arena have left horrible tastes in our mouth, we will not forget. And if the school keeps trying to push this down our throats with vote after vote after vote, they will find that the citizens will start voting NO for everything even when they ask for school bonds for educational purposes.

    LET THIS GO,

  • J Mullins

    Richard/Curly Acker/alias Chipmunk and numerous other pseudonyms. Your assertion that you “won” the ideological/philosophical argument some time ago is illustrative of your leftist propaganda methods to create an alternative reality. Just because you and your crew of imaginary people have argued your Marxist theology ad nauseam does not mean you have won the argument or persuaded all the readers of the correctness or validity of the bilge you vomit at decent people.
    You and your crew have demonstrated that you prowl the blogs looking for any conservative or Chrisitian comments, then jump in with insults, lies, hatred, anger,envy mongering against anyone who contradicts your athiestic Marxist theology.
    Do some of us who refuse to be enslaved under your dictatorship of socialist hegemonistic dominance revert to insults and labeling of you radicals? Of course we do, as you set such a competent example of personal attack against any who dare stand up to your screwy ideologies, so do we learn to turn your own tactics against you. If you don’t want to read insults against you, stop using them as your primary debating tactic.

    • Richard Olson

      Once again Jerome, you read a few words then before you can finish the sentence you start bouncing off walls, screaming hysterically like an old maid left at the alter.
      I did not say “we won the ideological/philosophical argument some time ago”, I said we won the argument that Nazi’s are conservatives. You don’t need to look to history to know that, just look at modern day Nazi’s. Only a fool would call them Liberals.

      Resume bouncing

      • Elliot Dallavalle

        RO, is this guy Jerome real? I want the name of the culprit that turned his rock over. Wow!!!!!

  • crucified

    You’ve not heard about pagans wanting to impose their views through laws??????????

    1) Legalizing the slaughter of millions of unborn babies.

    2) Forcibly taking money from those who’ve earned it to do with it as they see fit.

    3) Imposing government ran indoctrination centers to pervert young minds.

    4) Changing the definition of marriage and focring all of society to recognize and accept their (new) perverted defintion.

    5) Desiring to restrict gun ownership and infringe on the right to keep and bear arms.

    6) Taking private owned companies and giving them to their cronies like the Workers Unite ilk.

    7) Wanting to fundamentally transform the nation by a man who sees the US Constitution a flawed document.

    8) Because they view the US Constititution as a charter of negative liberties that restricts government from doing things to its citizens, they want to change the Constititution in order to allow an overzealous government to do things they deem necessary for its citizens.

  • crucified

    You’ve not heard about pagans wanting to impose their views through laws??????????

    1) Legalizing the murder of millions of unborn babies.

    2) Forcibly taking money from those who’ve earned it to do with it as they see fit.

    3) Imposing government ran indoctrination centers to pervert young minds.

    4) Changing the definition of marriage and focring all of society to recognize and accept their (new) perverted defintion.

    5) Desiring to restrict gun ownership and infringe on the right to keep and bear arms.

    6) Taking private owned companies and giving them to their cronies like the Workers Unite ilk.

    7) Wanting to fundamentally transform the nation by a man who sees the US Constitution a flawed document.

    8) Because they view the US Constititution as a charter of negative liberties that restricts government from doing things to its citizens, they want to change the Constititution in order to allow an overzealous government to do things they deem necessary for its citizens.

  • crucified

    You’ve not heard about pagans wanting to impose their views through laws??????????

    1) Legalizing the slaughter of millions of unborn babies.

    2) Forcibly taking money from those who’ve earned it to do with it as they see fit.

    3) Imposing government ran indoctrination centers to pervert young minds.

    4) Changing the definition of marriage and focring all of society to recognize and accept their (new) perverted defintion.

    5) Desiring to restrict gun ownership and infringe on the right to keep and bear arms.

    6) Taking private owned companies and giving them to their cronies like the Workers Unite ilk.

    • Richard Olson

      Merle, I think your username should be “off the deep end Merle” and that’s not because you’ve ever worked at a swimming pool.

      1. Why would we need to legalize abortion, it’s already legal. If you were truly against abortion you would support contraception.

      2. Yeah, we get it Merle, you don’t like to pay your fair share.

      3. Oh you mean like Church?

      4. You mean like Abraham marrying his sister, then having sex with her maid? Or marrying the woman you rape. Or like King David and his dozens of wives or how about his son King Solomon who had 700 wives and 300 concubines?

      5.Guilty, we want to restrict gun ownership to sane people. I see you’re against that.

      6. You mean like a friendly takeover then using the employees pension money to buy the company then fire the employees and sell off the company in parts? Then hide your profits in the Cayman Islands because like Merle Hexum, you don’t think you should pay your fair share.

      7. No Merle, Willard Romney lost the election. Try to keep up.

      8. Now you’re a mind reader. And anyone who doesn’t wear a tin foil hat like you is guilty of treason.
      I just love it when you espouse those Christian, family, freedom loving American values…sort of like Joe McCarthy.

      You’re a real American Merle. The kind of American that makes us a laughing stock to the rest of the world. The kind of American that spouts bible verses and his love for the constitution then does the exact opposite. In short, you’re “Taliban Lite”.

      • crucified

        Richard, I know your “off the deep end Richard” and that’s because all of your comments have no relationship to reality.

        1. Why do you people call it abortion rather than infanticide, is it to ease your conscience? It’s only legal because 7 ignorant men in black robes saw something in the constitution that didn’t exist, a right to kill an innocent human being. Do you know my stance on contraception?

        2. Once again you made an ignorant statement. I already don’t pay my fair share of taxes, because of an unfair progressive income tax, I get more than I pay in. Unlike you, I don’t choose which side of an issue to embrace based on personal benefit.

        3. Ignoranance! Church is volunatary, as are tithes and offerings. Church’s (at least the good ones) teaches God’s word which opens one’s mind to the truth. Public education (by the NEA’s own admission) has a liberal social and economic agenda, which they use to indoctrinate young children .

        4. They may have sinned against God (like Homo-sexuals), but they didn’t force the rest of society to accept their definition of marriage.

        5. Guilty, you want to restrict gun ownership from law abiding citizens and protect insane people under the guise of right to privacy.

        6. I mean a forced takeover of an American Company like GM by an all powerful Federal government. The difference between you and I is this; If Mittens did anything illegal I would want him to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. But if he took over a failing company about to go under, got rid of a corrupt union, cut the workforce in order to save many of the jobs; then I could care less where a free citizen in a free country invests his money. I would be willing to bet that Mr. Romney pays more in taxes than you, Larry, Curly & Moe paid combined. (The following question is not rhetorical) What exactly is paying fair share? Give me a percentage? Or better yet, in order to make it uniform, give me an exact amount?

        7. Richard, You really are ignorant. Now I don’t mean that as an insult. I was saying that youy’re stupid, but you are uninformed. Do you know who said the following? ” the Constitution is a flawed document”, “the constitution is a a charter of negative liberties, it says what the state and federal government cannot do to you, but it does not say what government must do on your behalf”, and “we are 5 days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America”

        8. I did not say anything about treason, but obviously you views the words of the person that I was quoting as being treasonous statements. Now to unveil who it was that actually said these things; IT WAS BHO who said them! You are correct; I am a Christian who loves my family, my freedom, and my country; unlike those who hate America so much that they want to Fundamentally transform it to something that would be unrecognizable to our Founding Fathers.…sort of like Joseph Stalin.

        I’m a real American. The kind of American that thinks Europe and most of the rest of the world are a laughing stock. The kind of American that loves God’s Word and the US Constitution, and want to preserve them from those who view them as outdated and no longer relevant. In short, I’m “A Conseravtive Christian”.

  • crucified

    7) Endorsing a man who sees the US Constitution a flawed document and who wants to fundamentally transform the USA.

    8) Wanting to change the US Constititution to allow an over zealous government to do things they deem necessary for the citizens, because they view the Constititution as a charter of negative liberties that restricts government from doing things to its citizens.

  • crucified

    7) Endorsing a man that wants to fundamentally transform the USA and who sees the US Constitution a flawed document.

    8) Wanting to change the US Constititution to allow an over zealous government to do things they deem necessary for the citizens, because they view the Constititution as a charter of negative liberties that restricts government from doing things to its citizens.

  • crucified

    7. Endorsing a man that wants to fundamentally transform the USA and who sees the US Constitution as a flawed document.

    8. Because they view the Constititution as a charter of negative liberties that restricts government from doing things to its citizens, they want to change the US Constitution to allow an over zealous government to do things they deem necessary for the citizens.

  • crucified

    7. Endorsing a man that wants to fundamentally transform the USA and who sees the US Constitution as a flawed document.

  • crucified

    7. Endorsing a man who wants to fundamentally transform the USA and who sees the Constitution as a flawed document.

    8. Because they view the Constititution as a charter of negative liberties that restricts government from doing things to its citizens, they want to change the US Constitution to allow an over zealous government to do things they deem necessary for the citizens.

  • crucified

    7. Embracing the ideas of a man that wants to fundamentally transform the U.S.A., and who sees the Constitution as a flawed document.

    8. Because they view the Constititution as a charter of negative liberties that restricts government from doing things to its citizens, they want to change the US Constitution to allow an over zealous government to do things they deem necessary for the citizens.

  • crucified

    7. Embracing a man who sees the Constitution as a flawed document, who wants to fundamentally transform the USA.

    8. Because they view the Constititution as a charter of negative liberties that restricts government from doing things to its citizens, they want to change the US Constitution to allow an over zealous government to do things they deem necessary for the citizens.

  • crucified

    7. Embracing a man who views the Constitution as flawed, and wants to fundamentally transform the USA.

    8. Because they view the Constititution as a charter of negative liberties that restricts government from doing things to its citizens, they want to change the US Constitution to allow an over zealous government to do things they deem necessary for the citizens.

    • J Mullins

      Merle, I suggest that your last sentence should read , “to allow the government to do what they deem necessary TO the citizens”, for they care not forthe citizens, only for their pagan urges.

  • crucified

    Richard, I know your “off the deep end Richard” and that’s because all of your comments have no relationship to reality.

    1. Why do you people call it abortion rather than infanticide, is it to ease your conscience? It’s only legal because 7 ignorant men in black robes saw something in the constitution that didn’t exist, a right to kill an innocent human being. Do you know my stance on contraception?

    2. Once again you made an ignorant statement. I already don’t pay my fair share of taxes, because of an unfair progressive income tax, I get more than I pay in. Unlike you, I don’t choose which side of an issue to embrace based on personal benefit.

    3. Ignoranance! Church is volunatary, as are tithes and offerings. Church’s (at least the good ones) teaches God’s word which opens one’s mind to the truth. Public education (by the NEA’s own admission) has a liberal social and economic agenda, which they use to indoctrinate young children .

    4. They may have sinned against God (like Homo-sexuals), but they didn’t force the rest of society to accept their definition of marriage.

    5. Guilty, you want to restrict gun ownership from law abiding citizens and protect insane people under the guise of right to privacy.

    6. I mean a forced takeover of an American Company like GM by an all powerful Federal government. The difference between you and I is this; If Mittens did anything illegal I would want him to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. But if he took over a failing company about to go under, got rid of a corrupt union, cut the workforce in order to save many of the jobs; then I could care less where a free citizen in a free country invests his money. I would be willing to bet that Mr. Romney pays more in taxes than you, Larry, Curly & Moe paid combined. (The following question is not rhetorical) What exactly is paying fair share? Give me a percentage? Or better yet, in order to make it uniform, give me an exact amount?

    7. Richard, You really are ignorant. Now I don’t mean that as an insult. I was saying that youy’re stupid, but you are uninformed. Do you know who said the following? ” the Constitution is a flawed document”, “the constitution is a a charter of negative liberties, it says what the state and federal government cannot do to you, but it does not say what government must do on your behalf”, and “we are 5 days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America”

    8. I did not say anything about treason, but obviously you views the words of the person that I was quoting as being treasonous statements. Now to unveil who it was that actually said these things; IT WAS BHO who said them! You are correct; I am a Christian who loves my family, my freedom, and my country; unlike those who hate America so much that they want to Fundamentally transform it to something that would be unrecognizable to our Founding Fathers.…sort of like Joseph Stalin.

    I’m a real American. The kind of American that thinks Europe and most of the rest of the world are a laughing stock. The kind of American that loves God’s Word and the US Constitution, and want to preserve them from those who view them as outdated and no longer relevant. In short, I’m “A Conseravtive Christian”.

  • crucified

    Richard, I know your “off the deep end Richard” and that’s because all of your comments have no relationship to reality.

    1. Why do you people call it abortion rather than infanticide, is it to ease your conscience? It’s only legal because 7 ignorant men in black robes saw something in the constitution that didn’t exist, a right to kill an innocent human being. Do you know my stance on contraception?

    2. Once again you made an ignorant statement. I already don’t pay my fair share of taxes, because of an unfair progressive income tax, I get more than I pay in. Unlike you, I don’t choose which side of an issue to embrace based on personal benefit.

    3. Ignoranance! Church is volunatary, as are tithes and offerings. Church’s (at least the good ones) teaches God’s word which opens one’s mind to the truth. Public education (by the NEA’s own admission) has a liberal social and economic agenda, which they use to indoctrinate young children .

    4. They may have sinned against God (like Homo-sexuals), but they didn’t force the rest of society to accept their definition of marriage.

    5. Guilty, you want to restrict gun ownership from law abiding citizens and protect insane people under the guise of right to privacy.

    6. I mean a forced takeover of an American Company like GM by an all powerful Federal government. The difference between you and I is this; If Mittens did anything illegal I would want him to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. But if he took over a failing company about to go under, got rid of a corrupt union, cut the workforce in order to save many of the jobs; then I could care less where a free citizen in a free country invests his money. I would be willing to bet that Mr. Romney pays more in taxes than you, Larry, Curly & Moe paid combined. (The following question is not rhetorical) What exactly is paying fair share? Give me a percentage? Or better yet, in order to make it uniform, give me an exact amount?

    7. Richard, You really are ignorant. Now I don’t mean that as an insult. I was saying that youy’re stupid, but you are uninformed. Do you know who said the following? ” the Constitution is a flawed document”, “the constitution is a a charter of negative liberties, it says what the state and federal government cannot do to you, but it does not say what government must do on your behalf”, and “we are 5 days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America”

    8. I did not say anything about treason, but obviously you views the words of the person that I was quoting as being treasonous statements. Now to unveil who it was that actually said these things; IT WAS BHO who said them! You are correct; I am a Christian who loves my family, my freedom, and my country; unlike those who hate America so much that they want to Fundamentally transform it to something that would be unrecognizable to our Founding Fathers.…sort of like Joseph Stalin.

  • crucified

    Richard, I know your “off the deep end Richard” and that’s because all of your comments have no relationship to reality.

    1. Why do you people call it abortion rather than infanticide, is it to ease your conscience? It’s only legal because 7 ignorant men in black robes saw something in the constitution that didn’t exist, a right to kill an innocent human being. Do you know my stance on contraception?

    2. Once again you made an ignorant statement. I already don’t pay my fair share of taxes, because of an unfair progressive income tax, I get more than I pay in. Unlike you, I don’t choose which side of an issue to embrace based on personal benefit.

    3. Ignoranance! Church is volunatary, as are tithes and offerings. Church’s (at least the good ones) teaches God’s word which opens one’s mind to the truth. Public education (by the NEA’s own admission) has a liberal social and economic agenda, which they use to indoctrinate young children .

    4. They may have sinned against God (like Homo-sexuals), but they didn’t force the rest of society to accept their definition of marriage.

    5. Guilty, you want to restrict gun ownership from law abiding citizens and protect insane people under the guise of right to privacy.

    6. I mean a forced takeover of an American Company like GM by an all powerful Federal government. The difference between you and I is this; If Mittens did anything illegal I would want him to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. But if he took over a failing company about to go under, got rid of a corrupt union, cut the workforce in order to save many of the jobs; then I could care less where a free citizen in a free country invests his money. I would be willing to bet that Mr. Romney pays more in taxes than you, Larry, Curly & Moe paid combined. (The following question is not rhetorical) What exactly is paying fair share? Give me a percentage? Or better yet, in order to make it uniform, give me an exact amount?

    7. Richard, You really are ignorant. Now I don’t mean that as an insult. I was saying that youy’re stupid, but you are uninformed. Do you know who said the following? ” the Constitution is a flawed document”, “the constitution is a a charter of negative liberties, it says what the state and federal government cannot do to you, but it does not say what government must do on your behalf”, and “we are 5 days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America”

  • crucified

    Richard, I know your “off the deep end Richard” and that’s because all of your comments have no relationship to reality.

    1. Why do you people call it abortion rather than infanticide, is it to ease your conscience? It’s only legal because 7 ignorant men in black robes saw something in the constitution that didn’t exist, a right to kill an innocent human being. Do you know my stance on contraception?

    2. Once again you made an ignorant statement. I already don’t pay my fair share of taxes, because of an unfair progressive income tax, I get more than I pay in. Unlike you, I don’t choose which side of an issue to embrace based on personal benefit.

    3. Ignoranance! Church is volunatary, as are tithes and offerings. Church’s (at least the good ones) teaches God’s word which opens one’s mind to the truth. Public education (by the NEA’s own admission) has a liberal social and economic agenda, which they use to indoctrinate young children .

    4. They may have sinned against God (like Homo-sexuals), but they didn’t force the rest of society to accept their definition of marriage.

    5. Guilty, you want to restrict gun ownership from law abiding citizens and protect insane people under the guise of right to privacy.

    6. I mean a forced takeover of an American Company like GM by an all powerful Federal government. The difference between you and I is this; If Mittens did anything illegal I would want him to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. But if he took over a failing company about to go under, got rid of a corrupt union, cut the workforce in order to save many of the jobs; then I could care less where a free citizen in a free country invests his money. I would be willing to bet that Mr. Romney pays more in taxes than you, Larry, Curly & Moe paid combined. (The following question is not rhetorical) What exactly is paying fair share? Give me a percentage? Or better yet, in order to make it uniform, give me an exact amount?

  • crucified

    7. Richard, You really are unlearned. Now I don’t mean that as an insult. I was saying that youy’re stupid, but you are uninformed. Do you know who said the following? ” the Constitution is a flawed document”, “the constitution is a a charter of negative liberties, it says what the state and federal government cannot do to you, but it does not say what government must do on your behalf”, and “we are 5 days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America”

    8. I did not say anything about treason, but obviously you views the words of the person that I was quoting as being treasonous statements. Now to unveil who it was that actually said these things; IT WAS BHO who said them! You are correct; I am a Christian who loves my family, my freedom, and my country; unlike those who hate America so much that they want to Fundamentally transform it to something that would be unrecognizable to our Founding Fathers.…sort of like Joseph Stalin.

    I’m a real American. The kind of American that thinks Europe and most of the rest of the world are a laughing stock. The kind of American that loves God’s Word and the US Constitution, and want to preserve them from those who view them as outdated and no longer relevant. In short, I’m “A Conseravtive Christian”.

  • crucified

    7. Richard, You really are ignorant. Now I don’t mean that as an insult. I was saying that youy’re stwpid, but you are uninformed. Do you know who said the following? ” the Constitution is a flawed document”, “the constitution is a a charter of negative liberties that says what the state and federal government cannot do to you, but it does not say what government must do on your behalf”, and “we are 5 days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America”

    8. I did not say anything about treason, but obviously you views the words of the person that I was quoting as being treasonous statements. Now to unveil who it was that actually said these things; IT WAS BHO who said them! You are correct; I am a Christian who loves my family, my freedom, and my country; unlike those who hate America so much that they want to Fundamentally transform it to something that would be unrecognizable to our Founding Fathers.…sort of like Joseph Stalin.

    I’m a real American. The kind of American that thinks Europe and most of the rest of the world are a laughing stock. The kind of American that loves God’s Word and the US Constitution, and want to preserve them from those who view them as outdated and no longer relevant. In short, I’m “A Conseravtive Christian”.

  • crucified

    7. Richard, You really are ignorant. Now I don’t mean that as an insult. I was not saying that youy’re stwpid, but you are uninformed. Do you know who said the following? ” the Constitution is a flawed document”, “the constitution is a a charter of negative liberties that says what the state and federal government cannot do to you, but it does not say what government must do on your behalf”, and “we are 5 days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America”

    8. I did not say anything about treason, but obviously you views the words of the person that I was quoting as being treasonous statements. Now to unveil who it was that actually said these things; IT WAS BHO who said them! You are correct; I am a Christian who loves my family, my freedom, and my country; unlike those who hate America so much that they want to Fundamentally transform it to something that would be unrecognizable to our Founding Fathers.…sort of like Joseph Stalin.

    I’m a real American. The kind of American that thinks Europe and most of the rest of the world are a laughing stock. The kind of American that loves God’s Word and the US Constitution, and want to preserve them from those who view them as outdated and no longer relevant. In short, I’m “A Conseravtive Christian”.

  • crucified

    7. Richard, You really are ignorant. Now I don’t mean that as an insult. I was not saying that youy’re stupid, but you are uninformed. Do you know who said the following? ” the Constitution is a flawed doc ument”, “the constitution is a a charter of negative liberties that says what the state and federal government cannot do to you, but it does not say what government must do on your behalf”, and “we are 5 days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America”

    8. I did not say anything about treason, but obviously you views the words of the person that I was quoting as being treasonous statements. Now to unveil who it was that actually said these things; IT WAS BHO who said them! You are correct; I am a Christian who loves my family, my freedom, and my country; unlike those who hate America so much that they want to Fundamentally transform it to something that would be unrecognizable to our Founding Fathers.…sort of like Joseph Stalin.

    I’m a real American. The kind of American that thinks Europe and most of the rest of the world are a laughing stock. The kind of American that loves God’s Word and the US Constitution, and want to preserve them from those who view them as outdated and no longer relevant. In short, I’m “A Conseravtive Christian”.

    • Walt Henry

      Was Tom Terrific the cartoon character who had the upside down funnel on his head and when he’d think real hard the smoke would blow out of the little hole on the top? If the founding fathers thought they had created a perfect document would have created a way for it to be amended or a branch of government with the sole job of interpreting what it means? Any steam Merle?

    • Richard Olson

      Merle, arguing with you is like plowing the same field over and over and over again. You are so transparent I could look right through you and see 1640 or even earlier.
      You don’t need to tell me your stance on abortion. All I need do is read what you write and know exactly what it is. There is absolutely no mystery to you at all, ever.
      I think the funniest thing you said tonight is “Church is voluntary”, wow, now that’s a whopper deserving of the Guinness Book of Records. If a member of your family ever said “Church is voluntary and I’m not going”, you would flip out off your rocker even more than usual. You would be absolutely beside yourself with self righteous indignation. I suspect church would be over and it would be Wednesday before you stopped shaking.
      I bet you would loose 20 pounds just worrying about the impending lightening strike from a furious God sticking that bolt up your wazoo. That smarts you know!

      Anyway, it’s late. The rest of your comment is undeserving of my time, I’m going to have a snack then retire where I will sleep the sleep of the innocent because my heart is pure and I’m not afraid of talking snakes of invisible old men in the sky.

  • crucified

    Poor Richard! Mommy and daddy forced you to go to church, while at the same time abused you or allowed someone within the church to abuse you. Don’t judge God by those who claimed to represent Him, while at the same time were hurting you. They were wolves in sheeps clothing.

    That’s a good idea, when faced with facts that you can’t refute, just eat, sleep and ignore them. That way you won’t have to acknowledge the truth and repent of your faulty thinking. In 1640 men had more wisdom than the enlightened intellectual of academia today.

    • Richard Olson

      No one abused me, in or out of church. I don’t judge god because there is no god. (another plowed field)
      It would be nice to have a poll of who people think ignores facts. You or me. Why don’t you tell me one fact that I ignore. That should be fairly simple, one isn’t that many is it? Just remember…solely because you believe something does not make it a fact, it has to be a near universally agreed fact. I say “near” because there are still some people who believe the world is flat and snakes can talk.

      Then you make the astounding statement…“In 1640 men had more wisdom than the enlightened intellectual of academia today.” Sure Merle, their method of determining truth by dunking and drowning people in dunking chairs was so much more advanced that current methods like lie detectors or scientific inquires. Another mark of their wisdom was their ability to find “witches”. They just asked impressionable little girls and even today we can’t find any. That may not be entirely true, I’m sure you know where a few are hiding.
      And their method of predicting the weather (rubbing a rock) was much more accurate than our satellites of today.

      Lastly Merle, I see you made your comment at 3:22 am, a time when I was fast asleep, soundly sleeping the sleep of the innocent. While you were awake pounding out fairy tales on your keyboard, with a guilty disturbed conscience which kept you awake.

  • crucified

    Richard says;

    1. “Why don’t you tell me one fact that I ignore.”

    “Do you know who said the following? ” the Constitution is a flawed doc ument”, “the constitution is a a charter of negative liberties that says what the state and federal government cannot do to you, but it does not say what government must do on your behalf”, and “we are 5 days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America” I did not say anything about treason, but obviously you views the words of the person that I was quoting as being treasonous statements. Now to unveil who it was that actually said these things; IT WAS BHO who said them! There are those who hate America and capitalism so much that they want to Fundamentally transform this nation into something that would be unrecognizable to our Founding Fathers.…sort of like Joseph Stalin.

    2. “there are still some people who believe the world is flat”

    It was the scientific world who thought that the world was flat. God and those who read His word knew the world was round many years before Columbus authenticated the fact.

    Isaiah 40:22 He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth…….

    3. “the more advanced that current methods like lie detectors or scientific inquires. And their method of predicting the weather (rubbing a rock) was much more accurate than our satellites of today.”

    I said wisdom, not advanced discovery and modern inventions. Wisdom is having the fear of God and the abiltiy to understand human nature. The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom! Those who do not fear God have not even begun down the path of Wisdom, let alone being advanced. The pseudo-intellectuals of today can’t even understand that the Utopia that they desire cannot exist apart from God. Look at history, when you take incentive away from labor you end up with everyone having nothing. No one will strive to succeed in a wealth redistibuting society.

    4. “I see you made your comment at 3:22 am, …. with a guilty disturbed conscience which kept you awake.”

    Just before I went to work at 3:30 a.m. with a clear conscience.

    • Richard Olson

      So you can’t tell me one fact that I ignore, I thought as much.
      President Obama did not say those things, you did and it’s just another example of you spreading your racist hatred of a black president.
      Isaiah 40:22 doesn’t prove anything especially that people thought the earth was a sphere. All it says is that viewed from above the earth looks like a circle (a flat circle with talking snakes)
      Wisdom is not having a fear of God, that’s superstition and once again that is you throwing your convoluted and fanciful beliefs around as if they were facts. The way you think Merle makes me wonder if the history books you read were written by monkeys. Because what you say has no anchor in fact.
      So you change money at 3:30 in the morning?

  • crucified

    If I can prove to you that Obama said those things, would it matter? Would you simply make an excuse for him or would you condemn him? Would you acknowledge you were wrong?

    • Richard Olson

      I’ve told you before Merle, I’m not one of your easily led, numb minded, ill informed superstitious followers. You can get by with that misleading, out of context, run on sentence crap at your Obama hating, prayer/snake handling meetings but not with me.

      Besides, before you try to change the subject again, you still haven’t told me one fact that I ignore, like you claimed I did nearly nine hours ago at 3:22 in the morning. One would have thought that within the span of nine hours you could have coughed up one example. Oh wait, perhaps you’re still trying to determine what a fact is. Keep looking. Here’s a hint…..you won’t find any in the bible.

    • Walt Henry

      Speaking of facts. A question–If the Founding Fathers believed the Constitution was perfect (as some commenters here believe) why did they create a procedure to modify and add to it? It is one thing to be able to read the words of something and quite another to understand what you’ve read. I know some commenters believe they are more just than God but do they also believe they have superior knowledge of what the creators of the Constitution created than the founders who created it?

  • crucified

    First you asked for a fact.

    Then I give you a fact.

    You proceeded to deny the fact.

    I then offered to give you proof of what I had said, if you will acknowledge that you were wrong, but you would not accept my challenge. This only proves that you refuse to change your mind even when confronted with the truth.

    • Walt Henry

      Merle, old buddy–you have made my day. I’ve been sitting here feeling sort of sorry for myself for my spring break is over and it’s sort of cold and dreary. It’ll be good to get back in the classroom and indoctrinate some more flexible young minds with radical left wing propaganda so I do have that to look forward to. But you have made my day! You say something is a fact and then you support it by saying it is a fact! hahahahahahahahaha Bridges with better support fall down. hahahaha

      • Richard Olson

        President Obama said that the constitution was an “imperfect” document because it condoned slavery.

        Merle Hexum wants to take his statement out of context by omitting any reference to slavery and present it here as proof that President Obama hates the constitution and our country. In doing so Merle Hexum is not disagreeing with any policy of the presidents or of liberals in general. His intent is racist in nature, because that is the only option left. There is other reason to come here and infer that Obama hates our constitution by telling lies about what the president said.
        When Merle Hexum presents a lie as a fact, he is in fact a liar. Many people tell lies, but when a person such as Merle Hexum who holds himself out as the very personification of what a super Christian should be, then tells willful lies, that is proof of the contempt he holds for the commandment forbidding false witness.

        President Obama said many things in the interview at which he said the constitution was an imperfect document and Merle Hexum chooses to cherry pick a few words, omit the context then present his version as what Obama said. Merle Hexum has done the same thing several times with a speech given by the attorney for the teachers union. Merle Hexum hates President Obama and unions, he is willing to say anything to cast both in a bad light for his own purposes and that is not the behavior one should expect from a real Christian. Especially one who pumps out bible verse after bible verse condemning others.

        As Jesus rebuked the Pharisees and Sadducees, if he could, he would rebuke Merle Hexum.
        With a warning not to be like them or him

  • crucified

    “President Obama did not say those things, you did and it’s just another example of you spreading your racist hatred of a black president.”

    “You can get by with that misleading, out of context, run on sentence crap at your Obama hating, prayer/snake handling meetings but not with me.”

    Sounds to me like someone is already back tracking!

  • crucified

    I never said it was fact simply because I say it is fact. What I said is that I will present the evidence once R.O. agrees to acknowledge that he was wrong if I’m able to prove to him that Obama actually said those things.

    • Richard Olson

      I have responded to you Merle but my comment is stuck in the filter. Essentially what I said was…

      President Obama said that the constitution was an “imperfect” document because it condoned slavery.

      Merle Hexum wants to take his statement out of context by omitting any reference to slavery and present it here as proof that President Obama hates the constitution and our country. In doing so Merle Hexum is not disagreeing with any policy of the presidents or of liberals in general. His intent is racist in nature, because that is the only option left. There is other reason to come here and infer that Obama hates our constitution by telling lies about what the president said.
      When Merle Hexum presents a lie as a fact, he is in fact a liar. Many people tell lies, but when a person such as Merle Hexum who holds himself out as the very personification of what a super Christian should be, then tells willful lies, that is proof of the contempt he holds for the commandment forbidding false witness.

    • Richard Olson

      My reply and my reworded reply are caught in the filter.

    • Walt Henry

      Still laughing!!! Sort of like saying the Constitution is perfect when the founding fathers acknowledged it wasn’t. hahahaha Good stuff!

      • Richard Olson

        In a radio interviews in 2001, State Senator Obama spoke at length about the constitution. In on interview, he called the Constitution an imperfect document in reference to it’s obvious omission of slaves being given equal rights. He stated that this imperfection, or blind spot in the culture, continues to this day. In a second interview, State Senator Obama asserted that the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties in that it states what the State and Federal government could not do to you. He asserts that it is flawed in that it does not state what the State and Federal governments should be obligated to do on your behalf.

        Slavery Merle, that’s the context. Slavery made the constitution “imperfect”. Since you disagree with what Obama said, I guess you’re in favor of slavery. Got any more speeches you want to cherry pick?

    • Elliot Dallavalle

      Merle – Other than the fact I do get a kick out of your need to number your paragraphs, your statement: “I never said it was fact simply because I say it is fact” reminds me of Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz) when he said this gem: “My remark was not intended to be a factual statement.”

      1. I do hope you continue to keep commenting.

      2. My daily dose of comedy material comes directly from some of your comments.

  • Richard Olson

    President Obama said that the constitution was an “imperfect” document because it condoned slavery.

    Merle Hexum wants to take his statement out of context by omitting any reference to slavery and present it here as proof that President Obama hates the constitution and our country. In doing so Merle Hexum is not disagreeing with any policy of the presidents or of liberals in general. His intent is racist in nature, because that is the only option left. There is other reason to come here and infer that Obama hates our constitution by telling lies about what the president said.
    When Merle Hexum presents a lie as a fact, he is in fact a liar. Many people tell lies, but when a person such as Merle Hexum who holds himself out as the very personification of what a super Christian should be, then tells willful lies, that is proof of the contempt he holds for the commandment forbidding false witness.

    President Obama said many things in the interview at which he said the constitution was an imperfect document and Merle Hexum chooses to cherry pick a few words, omit the context then present his version as what Obama said. Merle Hexum has done the same thing several times with a speech given by the attorney for the teachers union. Merle Hexum hates President Obama and unions, he is willing to say anything to cast both in a bad light for his own purposes and that is not the behavior one should expect from a real Christian. Especially one who pumps out bible verse after bible verse condemning others.

    As Jesus rebuked the Pharisees and Sadducees, if he could, he would rebuke Merle Hexum.
    With a warning not to be like them or him

  • Walt Henry

    When someone claims to have perfect knowledge and understanding of something written for the secular world (the claim the Constitution is perfect when the actions of the founding fathers show otherwise)and that person’s claims are proven to be unfounded, then we must consider his knowledge and understanding of the spiritual to be of little value. Until the Reagan Revolution people with strong religious convictions tended to stay out of politics for that very reason, just as Jesus had done. To do otherwise compromises the integrity of both and promotes the true value of neither. (I’m not suggesting religious fanatics go into hiding, just suggesting they make their “bible thumping” a little less conspicuous.)

  • crucified

    Larry, you’re a fraud. At least RO admits that he is an atheist and does not hide the fact that he’s a radical socialist. But you try to portray yourself as a moderate and a religious man, yet you agree 100% of the time with a socialist atheist. If you’re a moderate I would hated to see a pure leftist.

  • crucified

    The context was concerning the power to redistribue wealth.

    The Bill of Rights – the first 10 amendments. All of them prohibit the government from certain actions. No laws abridging the freedom of the press, speech, and religion. The right to keep and bear arms shall not be imfringed. No entry or seizure except upon duly issued warrant.

    It’s negative because it states what the government may NOT do.

    This is a good thing.

    Because it does not give HIM total control. I guess that’s why he is trying to make a mockery out of it. Shredding it piece by piece.

    It slows him down as he attempts to take over, he has to sneak around the darn thing to get what he wants!

    http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=obama+the+constitution+is+a+negative+document+youtube&mid=F39890BA198E49D4C3A2F39890BA198E49D4C3A2&view=detail&FORM=VIRE2

  • crucified

    The context is about the power and ability of the federal government to redistribue wealth.

    The Bill of Rights – the first 10 amendments. All of them prohibit the government from certain actions. No laws abridging the freedom of the press, speech, and religion. The right to keep and bear arms shall not be imfringed. No entry or seizure except upon duly issued warrant.

    It’s negative because it states what the government may NOT do.

    This is a good thing.

    Because it does not give HIM total control. I guess that’s why he is trying to make a mockery out of it. Shredding it piece by piece.

    It slows him down as he attempts to take over, he has to sneak around the darn thing to get what he wants!

    http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=obama+the+constitution+is+a+negative+document+youtube&mid=F39890BA198E49D4C3A2F39890BA198E49D4C3A2&view=detail&FORM=VIRE2

  • crucified

    The context is about the power and ability of the federal government to redistribue wealth.

    The Bill of Rights – the first 10 amendments. All of them prohibit the government from certain actions. No laws abridging the freedom of the press, speech, and religion. The right to keep and bear arms shall not be imfringed. No entry or seizure except upon duly issued warrant.

    It’s negative because it states what the government may NOT do.

    This is a good thing.

    Because it does not give HIM total control. I guess that’s why he is trying to make a mockery out of it. Shredding it piece by piece.

    It slows him down as he attempts to take over, he has to sneak around the thing to get what he wants!

    http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=obama+the+constitution+is+a+negative+document+youtube&mid=F39890BA198E49D4C3A2F39890BA198E49D4C3A2&view=detail&FORM=VIRE2

  • crucified

    The context is about the power and ability of the federal government to redistribue wealth.

    The Bill of Rights – the first 10 amendments. All of them prohibit the government from certain actions. No laws abridging the freedom of the press, speech, and religion. The right to keep and bear arms shall not be imfringed. No entry or seizure except upon duly issued warrant.

    It’s negative because it states what the government may NOT do.

    This is a good thing.

    Because it does not give HIM total control. I guess that’s why he is trying to make a mockery out of it. Shredding it piece by piece.

    It slows him down as he attempts to take over, he has to sneak around the darn thing to get what he wants!

  • crucified
  • crucified
    • Walt Henry

      Sometimes God uses the anger we feel in our hearts to let us know something in our souls is amiss. It is easy to calm ourselves by labeling others for it removes responsibility for the turmoil our souls from ourselves. Merle, your responses indicate some emotional turmoil. I wonder if a little introspection and time alone with the Creator might be in order.

      • Richard Olson

        I think he should stand in the corner.

  • Richard Olson

    This is my last comment on this particular issue Merle. I’ve allowed you much to much space to air your racism by responding to you so far.
    You cite as evidence of your fantastic claims 1 minute and 45 seconds cherry picked from a much longer interview with omits any mention of slavery to pretend his remarks were about redistribution of wealth rather than slavery. I knew your reading skills were deficient, but now you are determined to prove that you can not hear either.

    Your inability to comprehend written and spoken English is bewildering considering your age and supposedly drug free, sober status.

    I can conclude nothing more than if you had read then reported on the events of Friday November 22nd,1963 in Dallas, Texas….you would have said….”the President and Mrs. Kennedy enjoyed an uneventful motor trip through downtown Dallas”. As proof you would have provided a 16 mm film of the Kennedy’s before they passed the Texas School Book Depository.

    Does anyone ever wonder where they found four guys named Matthew, Mark Luke and John in the middle East in ancient times to write the gospels, when other people were named Maher-shalal-hash-baz, Gaal, Baal, Gazabar, Obed-edom, Zaanaim and Rabshakeh for example.

  • crucified

    Mr Olson,

    First, I want to thank you for giving me all the space that you’ve allowed me to have. I am so grateful for your kindness.

    R.O., you do an awful lot of assuming; and your assumptions reveal your ignorance.

    1) “If you were truly against abortion you would support contraception”

    You have no idea what my stance is on contraception. You make an ignorant assumption.

    2) “you don’t like to pay your fair share”

    As I told you, under the current system I do not pay my fair share, I would like a system in which all citizens have some skin in the game, not just 50% of the citizens. You make another ignorant assumption.

    3) Oh you mean like Church?

    You compare government forcing its citizen to pay fot indoctrination centers for young minds with parents teaching their children about God. Government is not our parent, nor do they have authority in our lives to dictate morallity. You make another ignorant statement.

    4) “Willard Romney lost the election”

    You accuse Romeny of being the man who wanted to fundamentally transform the USA and as the man who sees the US Constitution a flawed document. You had no idea that these were Obama’s stated goals and view of the consitution. You make another ignorant assumption.

    5) “we want to restrict gun ownership to sane people”

    You are so naive that you actually believe that evil men in power would stop at simply restricting insane people from purchasing a gun. I have some ocean front property in Arizona I would like to sell you! Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Do you actually know why the founding fathers instituted the 2nd amendment and why they gave it such a high priority on the list.? You assume that these evil men in DC just want what is best for you. You make another ignorant assumption.

    6) “The kind of American that makes us a laughing stock to the rest of the world. ”

    America, the greatest nation on the face of the earth, does not have worry about what the other countries in the world think about us, while most of them are living under some form of socialism, fascism, or totalitarianism. They can laugh all they want, but we are still the nation that most people in the world would like to live. They will want to come here up until we fall due to your atheistic and socialistic policies completely collapsing our economic and moral system. You assume that Americans should be concerned whether backward nations of the world approve of our system of government and God’s laws of morallity. You make another ignorant assumption.

    7) “I see you made your comment at 3:22 am, ……..you were awake pounding out fairy tales on your keyboard, with a guilty disturbed conscience which kept you awake.”

    You assumed that I was up all night, rather than getting ready to go to work at 3:00 a.m. You make another ignorant assumption.

    8) “So you change money at 3:30 in the morning?”

    You think you know what I do for a living, but you haven’t a clue. You make another ignorant assumption.

    9) “You can get by with that misleading, out of context, run on sentence crap at your Obama hating, prayer/snake handling meetings but not with me.”

    You assumed that Obama’s comments were somehow taken out of context (after first denying that he had ever said such things). He may have said that the constitution was flawed for allowing slavery to be permitted, but in the context that he was specifically speaking in this audio he was expressing disappointment that the founders only specified what the government was prohibited from doing to the citizens. Since he is a socialist, he wishes that founder’s would have given him (as president) permission to do things that they purposely did not want govrnment doing to the citizens. You make another ignorant assumption. The Founding Father’s, unlike liberals of today, had enough wisdom to understand that an all powerful government was something to be feared, not embraced. The 9th and 10th amendments were restrictions placed on the federal government, but are completely ignored by the federal government today.

    10) “President Obama did not say those things, you did and it’s just another example of you spreading your racist hatred of a black president.”

    After making this ignorant assumption, you later had retract your statement when you found out Obama actually had said those things. How did that crow taste? You make a 2nd ignorant assumption in the same sentence, calling me a racist. I am married to lady who is of both African and Indian descent. My children are of mix of many races and ethnic groups. You make 2 ignorant assumptions in 1 sentence. But that’s what liberals do when losing the argument. If a person disagrees with the ideology of their man/woman, just call them a racist. If someone chooses to maintain the traditional definition of marriage, without being forced to accept a newly created definition, just call them a homophobe. If a person wants to protect the innocent life of an unborn baby, just call them a sexist and a woman-hater.

    I know what they say happens when you “assume”, but in your case it is only “u”, and not “me”.

    OBAMA: “We are 5 days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America”

  • crucified

    Mr Olson,

    First, I want to thank you for giving me all the space that you’ve allowed me to have. I am so grateful for your kindness.

    R.O., you do an awful lot of assuming; and your assumptions reveal your ignorance.

    1) “If you were truly against abortion you would support contraception”

    You have no idea what my stance is on contraception. You make an ignorant assumption.

    2) “you don’t like to pay your fair share”

    As I told you, under the current system I do not pay my fair share, I would like a system in which all citizens have some skin in the game, not just 50% of the citizens. You make another ignorant assumption.

    3) Oh you mean like Church?

    You compare government forcing its citizen to pay fot indoctrination centers for young minds with parents teaching their children about God. Government is not our parent, nor do they have authority in our lives to dictate morallity. You make another ignorant statement.

    4) “Willard Romney lost the election”

    You accuse Romeny of being the man who wanted to fundamentally transform the USA and as the man who sees the US Constitution a flawed document. You had no idea that these were Obama’s stated goals and view of the consitution. You make another ignorant assumption.

    5) “we want to restrict gun ownership to sane people”

    You are so naive that you actually believe that evil men in power would stop at simply restricting insane people from purchasing a gun. I have some ocean front property in Arizona I would like to sell you! Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Do you actually know why the founding fathers instituted the 2nd amendment and why they gave it such a high priority on the list.? You assume that these evil men in DC just want what is best for you. You make another ignorant assumption.

    6) “The kind of American that makes us a laughing stock to the rest of the world. ”

    America, the greatest nation on the face of the earth, does not have worry about what the other countries in the world think about us, while most of them are living under some form of socialism, fascism, or totalitarianism. They can laugh all they want, but we are still the nation that most people in the world would like to live. They will want to come here up until we fall due to your atheistic and socialistic policies completely collapsing our economic and moral system. You assume that Americans should be concerned whether backward nations of the world approve of our system of government and God’s laws of morallity. You make another ignorant assumption.

    7) “I see you made your comment at 3:22 am, ……..you were awake pounding out fairy tales on your keyboard, with a guilty disturbed conscience which kept you awake.”

    You assumed that I was up all night, rather than getting ready to go to work at 3:00 a.m. You make another ignorant assumption.

    8) “So you change money at 3:30 in the morning?”

    You think you know what I do for a living, but you haven’t a clue. You make another ignorant assumption.

    9) “You can get by with that misleading, out of context, run on sentence crap at your Obama hating, prayer/snake handling meetings but not with me.”

    You assumed that Obama’s comments were somehow taken out of context (after first denying that he had ever said such things). He may have said that the constitution was flawed for allowing slavery to be permitted, but in the context that he was specifically speaking in this audio he was expressing disappointment that the founders only specified what the government was prohibited from doing to the citizens. Since he is a socialist, he wishes that founder’s would have given him (as president) permission to do things that they purposely did not want govrnment doing to the citizens. You make another ignorant assumption. The Founding Father’s, unlike liberals of today, had enough wisdom to understand that an all powerful government was something to be feared, not embraced. The 9th and 10th amendments were restrictions placed on the federal government, but are completely ignored by the federal government today.

    10) “President Obama did not say those things, you did and it’s just another example of you spreading your racist hatred of a black president.”

    After making this ignorant assumption, you later had retract your statement when you found out Obama actually had said those things. How did that crow taste? You make a 2nd ignorant assumption in the same sentence, calling me a racist. I am married to lady who is of both African and Indian descent. My children are of mix of many races and ethnic groups. You make 2 ignorant assumptions in 1 sentence. But that’s what liberals do when losing the argument. If a person disagrees with the ideology of their man/woman, just call them a racist. If someone chooses to maintain the traditional definition of marriage, without being forced to accept a newly created definition, just call them a homophobe. If a person wants to protect the innocent life of an unborn baby, just call them a woman-hater.

    I know what they say happens when you “assume”, but in your case it is only “u”, and not “me”.

  • crucified

    Mr Olson,

    First, I want to thank you for giving me all the space that you’ve allowed me to have. I am so grateful for your kindness.

    R.O., you do an awful lot of assuming; and your assumptions reveal your ignorance.

    1) “If you were truly against abortion you would support contraception”

    You have no idea what my stance is on contraception. You make an ignorant assumption.

    2) “you don’t like to pay your fair share”

    As I told you, under the current system I do not pay my fair share, I actually get moire than I pay in. I would like a system in which all citizens have some skin in the game, not just 50% of the citizens. You make another ignorant assumption.

    3) “Oh you mean like Church?”

    You compare government forcing its citizen to pay fot indoctrination centers for young minds, with parents teaching their children about God. Government is not our parent, nor do they have authority in our lives to dictate morallity. You make another ignorant statement.

    4) “Willard Romney lost the election”

    You assumed that Romeny was the man who wanted to fundamentally transform the USA and was the man who sees the US Constitution a flawed document. You had no idea that these were Obama’s stated goals and view of the consitution. You make another ignorant assumption.

    5) “we want to restrict gun ownership to sane people”

    You are so naive to actually believe that evil men in power would stop at simply restricting insane people from purchasing a gun. I have some ocean front property in Arizona I would like to sell you! Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Do you actually know why the founding fathers wrote the 2nd amendment and why they gave it such a high priority on the list.? You assume that these evil men in DC just want what is best for you. You make another ignorant assumption.

    6) “The kind of American that makes us a laughing stock to the rest of the world. ”

    America, the greatest nation on the face of the earth, does not have worry about what the other countries in the world think, while most of them are living under some form of socialism, fascism, or totalitarianism. They can laugh all they want, but we are still the nation that most of the people in the world would want to live. They will want to come here up until we fall due to your atheistic and socialistic policies completely collapsing our economic and moral system. You assume that Americans should be concerned whether backward nations of the world approve of our system of government and God’s laws of morallity. You make another ignorant assumption.

    7) “I see you made your comment at 3:22 am, ……..you were awake pounding out fairy tales on your keyboard, with a guilty disturbed conscience which kept you awake.”

    You assumed that I was up all night, rather than just getting ready to go to work at 3:00 a.m. You make another ignorant assumption.

    8) “So you change money at 3:30 in the morning?”

    You assume to know what I do for a living, but you haven’t a clue. You make another ignorant assumption.

    9) “You can get by with that misleading, out of context, run on sentence crap at your Obama hating, prayer/snake handling meetings but not with me.”

    You assumed that Obama’s comments were somehow taken out of context (after first having denied that Obama had ever said such things). He may have said that the constitution was flawed for allowing slavery to be permitted, but in the context that he was specifically speaking in this audio he was expressing disappointment that the founders only specified what the government was prohibited from doing to the citizens. Since he is a socialist, he wishes that founder’s would have given him (as president) permission to do things that they purposely did not want government doing to the citizens. You make another ignorant assumption. The Founding Father’s, unlike liberals of today, had enough wisdom to understand that an all powerful government was something to be feared, not embraced. The 9th and 10th amendments were restrictions placed on the federal government, but are completely ignored by the federal government today.

    10) “President Obama did not say those things, you did and it’s just another example of you spreading your racist hatred of a black president.”

    After making this ignorant assumption, you later had retract your statement when you found out Obama actually had said those things. How did that crow taste? You make a 2nd ignorant assumption in the same sentence, calling me a racist. I am married to lady who is of both African and Indian descent. My children are a mix of many races and ethnic groups. You make 2 ignorant assumptions in 1 sentence. But that’s what liberals do when losing the argument. If a person disagrees with the ideology of their man/woman, just call them a racist. If someone chooses to maintain the traditional definition of marriage, without being forced to accept a newly created definition, just call them a homophobe. If a person wants to protect the innocent life of an unborn baby, just call them a sexist and a woman-hater.

    I know what they say happens when you “assume”, but in your case it is only “u”, and not “me”.

    OBAMA: “We are 5 days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America”

  • crucified

    Mr Olson,

    First, I want to thank you for giving me all the space that you’ve allowed me to have. I am so grateful for your kindness.

    R.O., you do an awful lot of assuming; and your assumptions reveal your ignorance.

    1) “If you were truly against abortion you would support contraception”

    You have no idea what my stance is on contraception. You make an ignorant assumption.

    2) “you don’t like to pay your fair share”

    As I told you, under the current system I do not pay my fair share, I actually get moire than I pay in. I would like a system in which all citizens have some skin in the game, not just 50% of the citizens. You make another ignorant assumption.

    3) “Oh you mean like Church?”

    You compare government forcing its citizen to pay fot indoctrination centers for young minds, with parents teaching their children about God. Government is not our parent, nor do they have authority in our lives to dictate morallity. You make another ignorant statement.

    4) “Willard Romney lost the election”

    You assumed that Romeny was the man who wanted to fundamentally transform the USA and was the man who sees the US Constitution a flawed document. You had no idea that these were Obama’s stated goals and view of the consitution. You make another ignorant assumption.

    5) “we want to restrict gun ownership to sane people”

    You are so naive to actually believe that evil men in power would stop at simply restricting insane people from purchasing a gun. I have some ocean front property in Arizona I would like to sell you! Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Do you actually know why the founding fathers wrote the 2nd amendment and why they gave it such a high priority on the list.? You assume that these evil men in DC just want what is best for you. You make another ignorant assumption.

    6) “The kind of American that makes us a laughing stock to the rest of the world. ”

    America, the greatest nation on the face of the earth, does not have worry about what the other countries in the world think, while most of them are living under some form of socialism, fascism, or totalitarianism. They can laugh all they want, but we are still the nation that most of the people in the world would want to live. They will want to come here up until we fall due to your atheistic and socialistic policies completely collapsing our economic and moral system. You assume that Americans should be concerned whether backward nations of the world approve of our system of government and God’s laws of morallity. You make another ignorant assumption.

    7) “I see you made your comment at 3:22 am, ……..you were awake pounding out fairy tales on your keyboard, with a guilty disturbed conscience which kept you awake.”

    You assumed that I was up all night, rather than just getting ready to go to work at 3:00 a.m. You make another ignorant assumption.

    8) “So you change money at 3:30 in the morning?”

    You assume to know what I do for a living, but you haven’t a clue. You make another ignorant assumption.

    9) “You can get by with that misleading, out of context, run on sentence crap at your Obama hating, prayer/snake handling meetings but not with me.”

    You assumed that Obama’s comments were somehow taken out of context (after first having denied that Obama had ever said such things). He may have said that the constitution was flawed for allowing slavery to be permitted, but in the context that he was specifically speaking in this audio he was expressing disappointment that the founders only specified what the government was prohibited from doing to the citizens. Since he is a socialist, he wishes that founder’s would have given him (as president) permission to do things that they purposely did not want government doing to the citizens. You make another ignorant assumption. The Founding Father’s, unlike liberals of today, had enough wisdom to understand that an all powerful government was something to be feared, not embraced. The 9th and 10th amendments were restrictions placed on the federal government, but are completely ignored by the federal government today.

    10) “President Obama did not say those things, you did and it’s just another example of you spreading your racist hatred of a black president.”

    After making this ignorant assumption, you later had retract your statement when you found out Obama actually had said those things. How did that crow taste? You make a 2nd ignorant assumption in the same sentence, calling me a racist. I am married to lady who is of both African and Indian descent. My children are a mix of many races and ethnic groups. You make 2 ignorant assumptions in 1 sentence. But that’s what liberals do when losing the argument. If a person disagrees with the ideology of their man/woman, just call them a racist. If someone chooses to maintain the traditional definition of marriage, without being forced to accept a newly created definition, just call them a homophobe. If a person wants to protect the innocent life of an unborn baby, just call them a sexist and a woman-hater.

  • crucified

    Mr Olson,

    First, I want to thank you for giving me all the space that you’ve allowed me to have. I am so grateful for your kindness.

    R.O., you do an awful lot of assuming; and your assumptions reveal your ignorance.

    1) “If you were truly against abortion you would support contraception”

    You have no idea what my stance is on contraception. You make an ignorant assumption.

    2) “you don’t like to pay your fair share”

    As I told you, under the current system I do not pay my fair share, I actually get moire than I pay in. I would like a system in which all citizens have some skin in the game, not just 50% of the citizens. You make another ignorant assumption.

    3) “Oh you mean like Church?”

    You compare government forcing its citizen to pay fot indoctrination centers for young minds, with parents teaching their children about God. Government is not our parent, nor do they have authority in our lives to dictate morallity. You make another ignorant statement.

    4) “Willard Romney lost the election”

    You assumed that Romeny was the man who wanted to fundamentally transform the USA and was the man who sees the US Constitution a flawed document. You had no idea that these were Obama’s stated goals and view of the consitution. You make another ignorant assumption.

    5) “we want to restrict gun ownership to sane people”

    You are so naive to actually believe that evil men in power would stop at simply restricting insane people from purchasing a gun. I have some ocean front property in Arizona I would like to sell you! Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Do you actually know why the founding fathers wrote the 2nd amendment and why they gave it such a high priority on the list.? You assume that these evil men in DC just want what is best for you. You make another ignorant assumption.

    6) “The kind of American that makes us a laughing stock to the rest of the world. ”

    America, the greatest nation on the face of the earth, does not have worry about what the other countries in the world think, while most of them are living under some form of socialism, fascism, or totalitarianism. They can laugh all they want, but we are still the nation that most of the people in the world would want to live. They will want to come here up until we fall due to your atheistic and socialistic policies completely collapsing our economic and moral system. You assume that Americans should be concerned whether backward nations of the world approve of our system of government and God’s laws of morallity. You make another ignorant assumption.

    7) “I see you made your comment at 3:22 am, ……..you were awake pounding out fairy tales on your keyboard, with a guilty disturbed conscience which kept you awake.”

    You assumed that I was up all night, rather than just getting ready to go to work at 3:00 a.m. You make another ignorant assumption.

    8) “So you change money at 3:30 in the morning?”

    You assume to know what I do for a living, but you haven’t a clue. You make another ignorant assumption.

    9) “You can get by with that misleading, out of context, run on sentence crap at your Obama hating, prayer/snake handling meetings but not with me.”

    You assumed that Obama’s comments were somehow taken out of context (after first having denied that Obama had ever said such things). He may have said that the constitution was flawed for allowing slavery to be permitted, but in the context that he was specifically speaking in this audio he was expressing disappointment that the founders only specified what the government was prohibited from doing to the citizens. Since he is a socialist, he wishes that founder’s would have given him (as president) permission to do things that they purposely did not want government doing to the citizens. You make another ignorant assumption. The Founding Father’s, unlike liberals of today, had enough wisdom to understand that an all powerful government was something to be feared, not embraced. The 9th and 10th amendments were restrictions placed on the federal government, but are completely ignored by the federal government today.

  • crucified

    Mr Olson,

    First, I want to thank you for giving me all the space that you’ve allowed me to have. I am so grateful for your kindness.

    R.O., you do an awful lot of assuming; and your assumptions reveal your ignorance.

    1) “If you were truly against abortion you would support contraception”

    You have no idea what my stance is on contraception. You make an ignorant assumption.

    2) “you don’t like to pay your fair share”

    As I told you, under the current system I do not pay my fair share, I actually get moire than I pay in. I would like a system in which all citizens have some skin in the game, not just 50% of the citizens. You make another ignorant assumption.

    3) “Oh you mean like Church?”

    You compare government forcing its citizen to pay fot indoctrination centers for young minds, with parents teaching their children about God. Government is not our parent, nor do they have authority in our lives to dictate morallity. You make another ignorant statement.

    4) “Willard Romney lost the election”

    You assumed that Romeny was the man who wanted to fundamentally transform the USA and was the man who sees the US Constitution a flawed document. You had no idea that these were Obama’s stated goals and view of the consitution. You make another ignorant assumption.

    5) “we want to restrict gun ownership to sane people”

    You are so naive to actually believe that evil men in power would stop at simply restricting insane people from purchasing a gun. I have some ocean front property in Arizona I would like to sell you! Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Do you actually know why the founding fathers wrote the 2nd amendment and why they gave it such a high priority on the list.? You assume that these evil men in DC just want what is best for you. You make another ignorant assumption.

    6) “The kind of American that makes us a laughing stock to the rest of the world. ”

    America, the greatest nation on the face of the earth, does not have worry about what the other countries in the world think, while most of them are living under some form of socialism, fascism, or totalitarianism. They can laugh all they want, but we are still the nation that most of the people in the world would want to live. They will want to come here up until we fall due to your atheistic and socialistic policies completely collapsing our economic and moral system. You assume that Americans should be concerned whether backward nations of the world approve of our system of government and God’s laws of morallity. You make another ignorant assumption.

    7) “I see you made your comment at 3:22 am, ……..you were awake pounding out fairy tales on your keyboard, with a guilty disturbed conscience which kept you awake.”

    You assumed that I was up all night, rather than just getting ready to go to work at 3:00 a.m. You make another ignorant assumption.

    8) “So you change money at 3:30 in the morning?”

    You assume to know what I do for a living, but you haven’t a clue. You make another ignorant assumption.

  • crucified

    Mr Olson,

    First, I want to thank you for giving me all the space that you’ve allowed me to have. I am so grateful for your kindness.

    R.O., you do an awful lot of assuming; and your assumptions reveal your ignorance.

    1) “If you were truly against abortion you would support contraception”

    You have no idea what my stance is on contraception. You make an ignorant assumption.

    2) “you don’t like to pay your fair share”

    As I told you, under the current system I do not pay my fair share, I actually get moire than I pay in. I would like a system in which all citizens have some skin in the game, not just 50% of the citizens. You make another ignorant assumption.

    3) “Oh you mean like Church?”

    You compare government forcing its citizen to pay fot indoctrination centers for young minds, with parents teaching their children about God. Government is not our parent, nor do they have authority in our lives to dictate morallity. You make another ignorant statement.

    4) “Willard Romney lost the election”

    You assumed that Romeny was the man who wanted to fundamentally transform the USA and was the man who sees the US Constitution a flawed document. You had no idea that these were Obama’s stated goals and view of the consitution. You make another ignorant assumption.

    5) “we want to restrict gun ownership to sane people”

    You are so naive to actually believe that evil men in power would stop at simply restricting insane people from purchasing a gun. I have some ocean front property in Arizona I would like to sell you! Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Do you actually know why the founding fathers wrote the 2nd amendment and why they gave it such a high priority on the list.? You assume that these evil men in DC just want what is best for you. You make another ignorant assumption.

    6) “The kind of American that makes us a laughing stock to the rest of the world. ”

    America, the greatest nation on the face of the earth, does not have worry about what the other countries in the world think, while most of them are living under some form of socialism, fascism, or totalitarianism. They can laugh all they want, but we are still the nation that most of the people in the world would want to live. They will want to come here up until we fall due to your atheistic and socialistic policies completely collapsing our economic and moral system. You assume that Americans should be concerned whether backward nations of the world approve of our system of government and God’s laws of morallity. You make another ignorant assumption.

  • crucified

    Mr Olson,

    First, I want to thank you for giving me all the space that you’ve allowed me to have. I am so grateful for your kindness.

    R.O., you do an awful lot of assuming; and your assumptions reveal your ignorance.

    1) “If you were truly against abortion you would support contraception”

    You have no idea what my stance is on contraception. You make an ignorant assumption.

    2) “you don’t like to pay your fair share”

    As I told you, under the current system I do not pay my fair share, I actually get moire than I pay in. I would like a system in which all citizens have some skin in the game, not just 50% of the citizens. You make another ignorant assumption.

    3) “Oh you mean like Church?”

    You compare government forcing its citizen to pay fot indoctrination centers for young minds, with parents teaching their children about God. Government is not our parent, nor do they have authority in our lives to dictate morallity. You make another ignorant statement.

    4) “Willard Romney lost the election”

    You assumed that Romeny was the man who wanted to fundamentally transform the USA and was the man who sees the US Constitution a flawed document. You had no idea that these were Obama’s stated goals and view of the consitution. You make another ignorant assumption.

    5) “we want to restrict gun ownership to sane people”

    You are so naive to actually believe that evil men in power would stop at simply restricting insane people from purchasing a gun. I have some ocean front property in Arizona I would like to sell you! Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Do you actually know why the founding fathers wrote the 2nd amendment and why they gave it such a high priority on the list.? You assume that these evil men in DC just want what is best for you. You make another ignorant assumption.

  • crucified

    Mr Olson,

    First, I want to thank you for giving me all the space that you’ve allowed me to have. I am so grateful for your kindness.

    R.O., you do an awful lot of assuming; and your assumptions reveal your ignorance.

    1) “If you were truly against abortion you would support contraception”

    You have no idea what my stance is on contraception. You make an ignorant assumption.

    2) “you don’t like to pay your fair share”

    As I told you, under the current system I do not pay my fair share, I actually get moire than I pay in. I would like a system in which all citizens have some skin in the game, not just 50% of the citizens. You make another ignorant assumption.

    3) “Oh you mean like Church?”

    You compare government forcing its citizen to pay fot indoctrination centers for young minds, with parents teaching their children about God. Government is not our parent, nor do they have authority in our lives to dictate morallity. You make another ignorant statement.

    4) “Willard Romney lost the election”

    You assumed that Romeny was the man who wanted to fundamentally transform the USA and was the man who sees the US Constitution a flawed document. You had no idea that these were Obama’s stated goals and view of the consitution. You make another ignorant assumption.

  • crucified

    Mr Olson,

    First, I want to thank you for giving me all the space that you’ve allowed me to have. I am so grateful for your kindness.

    R.O., you do an awful lot of assuming; and your assumptions reveal your ignorance.

    1) “If you were truly against abortion you would support contraception”

    You have no idea what my stance is on contraception. You make an ignorant assumption.

    2) “you don’t like to pay your fair share”

    As I told you, under the current system I do not pay my fair share, I actually get moire than I pay in. I would like a system in which all citizens have some skin in the game, not just 50% of the citizens. You make another ignorant assumption.

    3) “Oh you mean like Church?”

    You compare government forcing its citizen to pay fot indoctrination centers for young minds, with parents teaching their children about God. Government is not our parent, nor do they have authority in our lives to dictate morallity. You make another ignorant statement.

  • crucified

    4) “Willard Romney lost the election”

    You assumed that Romney was the man who wanted to fundamentally transform the USA and was the man who sees the US Constitution as being flawed. You had no idea that these were Obama’s stated goals and his view of the consitution. You make another ignorant assumption.

    5) “we want to restrict gun ownership to sane people”
    You are so naive to actually believe that evil men in power would stop at simply restricting insane people from purchasing a gun. I have some ocean front property in Arizona I would like to sell you! Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Do you actually know why the founding fathers wrote the 2nd amendment and why they gave it such a high priority on the list.? You assume that these evil men in DC just want what is best for you. You make another ignorant assumption.

    6) “The kind of American that makes us a laughing stock to the rest of the world. ”

    America, the greatest nation on the face of the earth, does not have worry about what the other countries in the world think, while most of them are living under some form of socialism, fascism, or totalitarianism. They can laugh all they want, but we are still the nation that most of the people in the world would want to live. They will want to come here up until we fall due to your atheistic and socialistic policies completely collapsing our economic and moral system. You assume that Americans should be concerned whether backward nations of the world approve of our system of government and God’s laws of morallity. You make another ignorant assumption.

    7) “I see you made your comment at 3:22 am, ……..you were awake pounding out fairy tales on your keyboard, with a guilty disturbed conscience which kept you awake.”

    You assumed that I was up all night, rather than just getting ready to go to work at 3:00 a.m. You make another ignorant assumption.

    8) “So you change money at 3:30 in the morning?”

    You assume to know what I do for a living, but you haven’t a clue. You make another ignorant assumption.

    9) “You can get by with that misleading, out of context, run on sentence crap at your Obama hating, prayer/snake handling meetings but not with me.”

    You assumed that Obama’s comments were somehow taken out of context (after first having denied that Obama had ever said such things). He may have said that the constitution was flawed for allowing slavery to be permitted, but in the context that he was specifically speaking in this audio he was expressing disappointment that the founders only specified what the government was prohibited from doing to the citizens. Since he is a socialist, he wishes that founder’s would have given him (as president) permission to do things that they purposely did not want government doing to the citizens. You make another ignorant assumption. The Founding Father’s, unlike liberals of today, had enough wisdom to understand that an all powerful government was something to be feared, not embraced. The 9th and 10th amendments were restrictions placed on the federal government, but are completely ignored by the federal government today.

    10) “President Obama did not say those things, you did and it’s just another example of you spreading your racist hatred of a black president.”

    After making this ignorant assumption, you later had retract your statement when you found out Obama actually had said those things. How did that crow taste? You make a 2nd ignorant assumption in the same sentence, calling me a racist. I am married to lady who is of both African and Indian descent. My children are a mix of many races and ethnic groups. You make 2 ignorant assumptions in 1 sentence. But that’s what liberals do when losing the argument. If a person disagrees with the ideology of their man/woman, just call them a racist. If someone chooses to maintain the traditional definition of marriage, without being forced to accept a newly created definition, just call them a homophobe. If a person wants to protect the innocent life of an unborn baby, just call them a sexist and a woman-hater.

    I know what they say happens when you “assume”, but in your case it is only “u”, and not “me”.

    OBAMA: “We are 5 days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America”

Editor's Picks

Third farm in county hit with bird flu

A commercial turkey farm with 36,400 birds was hit with the avian influenza this week in Otter Tail County. It is the third outbreak in ... Read more

Increase awareness of oil trains’ dangers fuel debate

Thousands in metro live within half-mile of ‘evacuation zones’ ST. PAUL — The Canadian Pacific and BNSF railroad tracks have run through the Twin Cities ... Read more

Prom, I-94 Speedway races highlight weekend

This weekend students of the Fergus Falls High School will be dressed to the nines. Students in their elegant gowns and striking tuxedos will make ... Read more

Wills for Heroes to prepare wills for first responders

The Fergus Falls Police Department will host a “Wills for Heroes” event Saturday where 30 first responders, other emergency personnel and their spouses will work ... Read more