Archived Story

Farm Bill would cost taxpayers too much

Published 9:32am Friday, May 3, 2013 Updated 11:35am Friday, May 3, 2013

As Congress focuses on the 2013 Farm Bill, I ask my fellow taxpayers to add this to the debate.

If a Minnesota farmer farms an area equivalent to Itasca State Park, the protected area of the headwaters of the Mississippi River, which is about 33,250 acres or about one and a half townships, should we allow the 2013 Farm Bill to continue the practices of the 2008 Farm Bill, of paying about 60 percent of our Millionaire Farmer’s crop insurance premium?

For if this mega farmer elected to use Federal Crop Insurance like most U.S. farmers did on their 2012 and 2013 crops, this taxpayer-funded premium reduction in 2012 and 2013 would be a about $1 million per year in subsidy grants.

It’s OK with Congress, is it OK with you?


Alan Roebke



Editor's Picks

Warrant out for alleged drunk driver: van totaled in May rollover [UPDATED]

OTTERTAIL — A warrant was issued Monday for a 33-year-old Perham woman who allegedly was intoxicated when she rolled a minivan and injured two passengers ... Read more

County hires tourism director

Otter Tail County and Otter Tail Lakes Country, a nonprofit organization promoting regional tourism since 1976, have announced the selection of Nick Leonard as Otter ... Read more

Dates set for 3rd annual Kirkbride weekend

The third annual Kirkbride Arts & History Weekend, a multidisciplinary arts event that explores the past and future of the Fergus Falls State Hospital, will ... Read more