Print this story | E-mail story | This story has 3 comments Add your own | iPod friendly
Skogen: Public input still taken on dock issues
Published Wednesday, August 27, 2008
Dan Skogen
The public comment period on new DNR dock rules and regulations is an ongoing process, said Minnesota State Sen. Dan Skogen (D-Hewitt) who on Saturday addressed members of the Otter Tail Coalition of Lakes Association (COLA) at the Ottertail Community Room.
DNR General Permit No. 2008-0401 was issued to address a growing problem and deal with inconsistencies in the existing rules. In parts of the state there have been an increase in the size and number of platforms at the end of docks.
Even though there have been regulations on docks for many years, numerous unauthorized platforms have been installed and continue to be marketed. After a year of educating people about relevant regulations and gathering information from the dock industry, a decision was made on what the new General Permit would authorize.
General Permit No. 2008-0401 considers many of the concerns that the DNR heard over the many months of information gathering. It acknowledges that standard dock sections may be longer than eight feet and are manufactured in a variety of shapes and sizes.
“It suggests that impacts in the lake be kept to a modest area because the DNR is aware that the sprawl of docks, canopies, aquatic plant removal, sand blankets, boat lifts, and other disturbances do affect the near shore ecology of lakes,” Skogen said. “However, people wanted different lakes treated differently, so the permit is only effective on lakes with general development and recreational development shoreland classification.”
Skogen said that counties such as Otter Tail and lake conservation districts have the ability to opt out of having the general permit applicable within their jurisdictions.
On another issue, he said that shore and development rules, which have not been updated since 1989, also are being addressed by the DNR as are public comments on new dock rules and regulations.
As for successes and failures on invasive species eradication and control, Skogen told COLA members that there’s nothing new legislatively — just reminders pertaining to invasive species awareness on the part of the general public.
Skogen spent some time with COLA members talking about the constitutional amendment for the environment, parks, and the arts.
“A study will determine how many lake home owners are renting out their homes for awhile during the summer months,” Skogen said.
“We need to know if these homes are safe.”
Comments
The Daily Journal is happy to host community conversations about news and life in Fergus Falls and the surrounding area. As hosts, we expect guests will show respect for each other. That means we don't threaten or defame each other, and we keep conversations free of personal attacks. Witty is great. Abusive is not. If you think a post violates these standards, don't escalate the situation. Instead, flag the comment to alert us. We'll take action if necessary. It's not hard. This should be a place where people want to read and contribute -- a place for spirited exchanges of opinion. So those who persist with racist, defamatory or abusive postings risk losing the privilege to post at all.Posted by ajohnsonx (anonymous) on August 28, 2008 at 10:18 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I propose all residents should be allowed to have one "junk dock" in their front yards.
Posted by Lurker (anonymous) on August 28, 2008 at 1:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)
To ajohnsonx- A "junk dock" in your YARD would be called a junk deck. I see lots of junk decks around, and you can, too...just go for a drive. I would rather have a nice looking dock...like mine!
Posted by ajohnsonx (anonymous) on August 28, 2008 at 4:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)
what.....?.....I was posting a sarcastic comment regarding Mr. Jamie Coopers city council platform of allowing each resident to have one junk car on their property
Post a comment
(Requires free registration.)