Print this story | E-mail story | This story has 2 comments Add your own | iPod friendly

Big Tobacco should stop exploiting youth

Published Thursday, March 20, 2008

Prior to the Freedom to Breathe Act of Oct. 1, 2007, I sent a pair of letters to every tobacco supplier in Minnesota and every vendor in Otter Tail County. Here are the following excerpts:

"People say they can recall where they were when Kennedy was assassinated. I remember. And when the horrifying scenes of 9/11 were broadcast, I was stunned.

But the day I woke to the lifeless body of my son will always remain the most awful day. Isaac was only 6 weeks old when he died. They said it was due to Sudden infant Death Syndrome.

Imagine the shock after finding these words: “By inhaling the poisonous tobacco, effluvia, which is thrown from the lungs and the pores of the skin, the system of the infant is filled with the poison. While it acts upon some as a slow poison and affects the brain, heart and liver, and lungs, and they waste away and fade gradually, upon others it has a more direct influence, causing spasms, fits, paralysis, palsy, and sudden death.” (This was published in 1867).

"My son cried because his sensitive lungs were subjected to the toxic air. All the while I was oblivious to the fact I was producing a lethal environment. He finally succumbed to a filthy practice he never chose."

"Dear vendor, it's not too late to stop what you're doing. You can redeem the time, but only by changing your course. Your future crop will not be temporal materials... and your harvest will be seen in the healthy faces of living, breathing children. But it's not enough to eradicate tobacco.

There's a need to fill the vacancy with time and talents to facilitate hope and healing. Please restore integrity and health to our home of the brave. Help our country to be free from the chains of vice. Thank you."

The tobacco industry has infiltrated every hamlet and enterprise in America for over 100 years. The irony of its longevity is illustrated in the abbreviated lives of countless victims. Our practical sympathies belong to something much higher than the foul influence of vice. Let us crush the supply of that detestable plague by shunning the demand.

Any truly worthy endeavor has never relied upon the ill-gotten gains of desperate pleasures. It would be far better to stop exploiting the youth than to continue in pretentious addictions.

Robert John Noah - Underwood

Comments

The Daily Journal is happy to host community conversations about news and life in Fergus Falls and the surrounding area. As hosts, we expect guests will show respect for each other. That means we don't threaten or defame each other, and we keep conversations free of personal attacks. Witty is great. Abusive is not. If you think a post violates these standards, don't escalate the situation. Instead, flag the comment to alert us. We'll take action if necessary. It's not hard. This should be a place where people want to read and contribute -- a place for spirited exchanges of opinion. So those who persist with racist, defamatory or abusive postings risk losing the privilege to post at all.

Posted by Commycrat (anonymous) on March 20, 2008 at 2:58 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Amen, and while we are outlawing tabaco lets make sure we legalize marijuana! Some of the editorials in this paper make your head spin.

Posted by walleye29 (anonymous) on March 20, 2008 at 10 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I am truely sorry for your loss, but the right to do a legal activity in a private place should not be restricted on a private business owner or anyone else. I am non-smoker and do not allow smoking in my home, however I find the new smoking ban to be just as repulsive as if they made a law stating that we had to allow smoking in a privately owned building. This decision should be left up to the proprietor. I do feel that requiring a business that allows smoking to post that fact on doors entering the premise would give those not wishing to be subject to second hand smoke the warning they deserve. If enough people choose to patronize the place, the owner will decide to change his policy. The bottom line is that we should dictate to building owners on this type of activity. As far as government buildings are concerned, if the legislature wants them smoke free, so be it!

Post a comment

(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:



© 2008, Fergus Falls Newspapers, Inc.

Boone Newspapers, Inc. | About us | Subscribe | Printing | E-Edition | Contact us | Advertise with us