Print this story |
E-mail story |
This story has 6 comments Add your own |
iPod friendly | Bookmark this
What is this?
Change, air grills and health care
Published Tuesday, September 16, 2008
Alan Linda
The conversation with a friend began with our mutual concerns about the rising cost of our health care in this country.
“I don’t see how, with the medical providers entrenched so deeply in our American life, we’ll ever get this under control.” I said that.
It’s pretty true. Our current presidential candidates can utter what ever blarney about fixing this problem of the out-of-control cost of health care when “they” get elected, but it’s not going to happen.
It’s not going to happen because this is the system we have, and it’s very, very difficult for people to change something to which they’ve become accustomed.
Not too long ago, I had the chance to speak with someone from Sweden, which has a national health care plan, paid for by taxes. “How much do you lose out of your paycheck, percentage-wise?” That was my question to her.
I expected an answer in the 50-percent range, easy. Sweden has that reputation of high taxes, a fact often told to us here in the USA when the alternative of nationalizing health care comes up. Oh, we can’t do that, we’re told — it’s way too expensive, look at Sweden, how high their taxes are.
Incidentally, last time I looked, we ranked first in the cost of health care in the world, and 20-something in every other measure of how good that health care was. Sweden is in the top 10, maybe top five. They have to have big taxes to pay for that, right?
She answered: “I lose about a third of my check.”
“A third?” Really! Then, there’s more for health care, right?
“No. A third. What do you lose?”
I didn’t even want to answer, because we, too, lose about a third. Plus, then we pay for various medical costs. All this stuff we’ve been told by the entrenched medical providers about why we cannot change this system is apparently hooey. They’re making money.
That money elects politicians who have enough screws loose to want to be president, or whatever, and will say anything to get there.
What does that tell you about changing something, once it has become “normal” to humans? It tells you that it’s almost impossible.
So this friend says: “I’ll give you an example of something that’s been done the same way forever, and is stupid.” He fingered the belt loop on the left-hand side of the carpenter pants he was wearing, and said: “Most of us are right handed? Why is the hammer over here on the left side?”
He went on to sputter about how stupid the manufacturers were, making pants for left-handed carpenters. Then he pantomimed holding up a two by four with his right hand, trying to grab the hammer with his left, transferring the hammer to his right hand while ... you get the picture.
I said to him: “Well, you bought them the way they were, right?” In other words, why should they change. It’s America. Change comes hard.
Since he’s a carpenter, I told him, perhaps he could explain why all 120-volt circular power saws are made for left-handed people. I’ve always wondered about that. (When you hold a power saw in your right hand, first comes the motor, which extends to your right of the grip. Then the guard that surrounds the blade is even further away from you to the right.)
To see where the line is that you’re following, you have to lean way over the saw and peer down past your shirt sleeve, the guard, and the foot of the saw to see whatever line it is you’re trying to follow.
Why isn’t the blade on the left, where it could be easily seen? Because, I’ll bet you, that the first saw was made like that, and they keep selling, so why not? Change comes hard.
When I first started teaching, I watched students — who mostly aren’t all that handy with tools — try to fir an opening down in size by nailing on a scab of board so a 14-inch return air grill would fit in a 16-inch-center stud wall. These grills are made by a company called the Lima.
After watching these students bend over nails and grumble, I got on the phone one Friday afternoon and called the Lima people.
After several minutes, I got an engineer, and asked him: “Do you know if studs used to be spaced on 14-inch centers back in history?”
No, he didn’t think so.
“Aren’t you guys the largest manufacturer of grills in the USA?”
He did think so.
“Aren’t wall studs on 16-inch centers, the way they’ve been for a hundred years?”
Yeeessss, he reluctantly said. He had to see now where I was headed.
“Then why in hell aren’t you guys making grills that fit 16-inch centered studs?”
Well first, he replied, no one has asked us to.
“I just did,” I replied.
But we only take input from salespeople, he said.
“What in heck do salespeople know about actually installing these pain-in-the-butt grills you guys have been foisting on us for who knows how long?”
There. I felt better, until he replied.
He said, not much, but that’s the way it’s always been. Goodbye.
We can’t change a $4 return-air grill.
We’re a right-handed nation with a left-handed health care industry.
Good luck changing that.
WOULD YOU LIKE TO SHARE THIS STORY?
Alan Linda writes from his New York Mills home.



Comments
The Daily Journal is happy to host community conversations about news and life in Fergus Falls and the surrounding area. As hosts, we expect guests will show respect for each other. That means we don't threaten or defame each other, and we keep conversations free of personal attacks. Witty is great. Abusive is not. If you think a post violates these standards, don't escalate the situation. Instead, flag the comment to alert us. We'll take action if necessary. It's not hard. This should be a place where people want to read and contribute -- a place for spirited exchanges of opinion. So those who persist with racist, defamatory or abusive postings risk losing the privilege to post at all.Posted by werty (anonymous) on September 16, 2008 at 3:40 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The person you are speaking with from Sweden must be in error. Swedens avg income tax approach 50% while the us approaches 30%. Much higher than the US. I wouldn't be interested in having taxes that high.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Incom...
Posted by mgdbottled (anonymous) on September 18, 2008 at 10:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Keep the health care providers private; but, let me buy into medicare with a variety of different plans, at any age. Problem solved. I'd much rather give the $8000.00 I pay to the insurance company to the government. I could probably get by with only paying $4000.00 because the terrible inefficiencies in the current private system would disappear and I wouldn't have to argue with the insurance company everytime I needed a medical procedure done. I'd know it was going to be paid for. The "for profit" insurance companies would be out of business overnight. Many of their workers would be looking for work. Give them a priority status to administer the new expanded medicare payor program. Maybe, the government could actually make some money for a change. Americans are just to stupid to realize that the "for profit" payor system is a left handed approach. Money is more important than human life in America, though. That's abundantly clear. Must not have another social program. God forbid.
Posted by apinion (anonymous) on September 21, 2008 at 12:56 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Did you happen to ask how the healthcare system in Sweden is? Ie can you call into a clinic and get in the same day? Can you go to any doctor you choose? Chances are the answer is going to be NO! There is an easy way to make healthcare cheaper. Make you wait, if doctors are busy 100% of the time and never have any time that their not seeing a patent that is the way to provide the cheapest service. Unfortunately you may have to wait weeks to months to get into see the doctor and if there happened to be anything seriously wrong with you by the time you see the doctor you may have ALREADY DIED!!! But that is a trade off that Sweden has chosen to make!
Posted by mgdbottled (anonymous) on September 21, 2008 at 11:31 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I just made an appointment with my doctor's office. I can get in in two months so long as I have the money for the co-pay. No money, no appointment. I guess my high blood pressure can wait another two months? Glad I'm not bleeding. The American health care system is so broken, it's nearly non-existent. Save your propaganda for the sheep. It doesn't work on me.
Posted by apinion (anonymous) on September 21, 2008 at 11:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Let me guess, you are going to the Fergus Clinic!!! Do your self a favor and go some place else! If any thing were ACTUALLY wrong with you Fergus would not find it anyway! So what difference does it make if you have to wait 2 months to get in??? I bet you could go to Fargo and get in tommorrow!!!
Posted by mgdbottled (anonymous) on September 22, 2008 at 8:55 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I left Fergus Falls in 1979. I live in NW Michigan where there are literally hundreds of medical facilities available and one of the best heart centers in the world. They are all backed up at least two months. The USA has fallen to one of worst countries in medical care in the industrialized world. It's thanks to folks who think like you. You really need to wake up and see what's going on around you. Clinics are going broke and merging with each other in an attempt to stay afloat all around the country. Why, because 50 million americans don't have insurance. Under McCains proposals, that number is expected to increase to 70 million. Let's fix the system. Not make it worse.
Post a comment
(Requires free registration.)