Print this story | E-mail story | This story has 4 comments Add your own | iPod friendly | Bookmark this Facebook bookmark del.icio.us bookmark StumbleUpon bookmark Digg bookmark What is this?

Ditch stumps the county inspector

Published 12:00 p.m., May 13, 2009

A ditch system in St. Olaf Township has the Otter Tail County ditch inspector stumped.

Sewell Lake has several places where water travels into the lake, including Ditch No. 70. The problem is the only outlet for the lake is a 12-inch tile, which has a restrictive valve placed in it which makes it now 8 inches, Ditch Inspector Randy Wasvick told the Otter Tail County Board Tuesday. That water then dumps into Ditch No. 52 and eventually ends up in Grant County.

“I don’t understand the design of it,” Wasvick said of the original 1923 design.

Wasvick guessed that when the ditch system was built in 1923, county staff felt there wouldn’t be homes built on Sewell Lake. The lake probably was meant to be a “catch pond” that holds water while letting it out slowly, he said.

Commissioner John Lindquist pointed out that in 1923, the 12-inch outlet probably worked. Lindquist estimated that since then, the amount of water going into the lake has increased five-fold.

The increased flow has caused the water level of Sewell Lake to rise and caused years of flooding problems, Wasvick said while showing pictures of the area to commissioners. The water level of the lake is causing the water to flood out of Ditch 70, he said. The flooding is causing residents to lose property and tillable land to water, he said. One home on the east end of the lake has significant flooding problems, Land and Resource Director Bill Kalar said.

In 1994, residents petitioned the county board to fix Ditch 70, which was denied. County Attorney Dave Hauser said it was denied because the system was doing what it was designed to do and water was leaving the lake. Wasvick said, according to the minutes from the 1994 board meeting, commissioners asked for a show of hands for and against fixing the system. A majority of the residents opposed the proposal.

Commissioners agreed that something needs to be done about the problem and authorized Wasvick to begin the process of working with staff from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR).

A permit will be needed from the DNR because the work will be completed below 1,298 feet, or what the DNR has identified as the lake’s ordinary high water level. The ordinary high water level is the highest level maintained for a sufficient period of time, according to the DNR.

Wasvick said he recommends Ditch 70 be redetermined for benefits and an engineering study be completed. Wasvick cautioned the board that it would take about two years before the flooding problem could be solved.

In 1923, 445.8 acres of land benefited from the ditch with a value of $35,319, Wasvick said. Today, the ditch doesn’t have a fund to pay for repairs.

No information could be found in the ditch’s file as to why or when the tile was restricted to 8 inches, Wasvick said. The 12-inch tile follows an old crick bottom, Wasvick said.


WOULD YOU LIKE TO SHARE THIS STORY?

Bookmark and Share

Comments

The Daily Journal is happy to host community conversations about news and life in Fergus Falls and the surrounding area. As hosts, we expect guests will show respect for each other. That means we don't threaten or defame each other, and we keep conversations free of personal attacks. Those who persist with racist, defamatory or abusive postings risk losing the privilege to post. To post a comment you will need to register. Or, if you're already registered but have not included your true, verifiable identity with your registration, you will need to update your account to include your identity. Effective Dec. 1, 2009, all posts appear with the commenter's true identity, which must be verified by site staff. Those who registered prior to Dec. 1, 2009, should be aware that once you update your information with your true identity, all prior posts under your user name will also indicate your true identity. If you do not wish to link yourself to prior comments, you should register again with a different user name.

Posted by farawaythankgod (anonymous) on May 13, 2009 at 1:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Wow - this story has everything a newspaper reader could possible want: The right mixture of scandal, sex and money. Plus an answer to the age old question how to spell the word 'creek'. No wonder it made the top of today's stories!

Posted by FindTheTruth (anonymous) on May 13, 2009 at 2:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)

"Crick" is a synonym of "creek" in the Northern, North Midland, and Western U.S. (according to dictionary.com).

Posted by watermelon (anonymous) on May 13, 2009 at 4:48 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Do not speak ill of the ditch inspector. The ditch inspector knows all. Sees all.

On a serious note. What is with all the recent coverage regarding "ditch no.70?" You guys are on a beeline for coverage on Letterman's Small-town news segment _again_.

Posted by farawaythankgod (anonymous) on May 13, 2009 at 8:17 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I didn't know that. Thanks.

Post a comment (Terms of Use Policy)

(Requires free registration.)

You may also register to comment in our forums at www.fergusfeedback.com.



© 2010, Fergus Falls Newspapers, Inc.

Boone Newspapers, Inc. | About us | Subscribe | Contact us | Advertise with us | Privacy Policy