Print this story |
E-mail story |
This story has 6 comments Add your own |
iPod friendly | Bookmark this
What is this?
Wind Company: turbines won't hamper farmers, residents
Published 12:00 p.m., October 28, 2009
A proposed wind farm near Parkers Prairie won’t hamper agricultural activities, nor will the noise affect residents, according to Prairie Wind Energy LLC Board members.
Four board members, including President Terry Carlson, attended the Otter Tail County Board meeting Tuesday to answer any questions regarding the project and also update the board that it is completing its due diligence on the project. Twenty people attended the meeting.
So far, 21 landowners have signed leases that allow the company to place wind turbines on their property, for a total of 7,900 acres of leased property. That’s enough for the company to move ahead with the project, Carlson said after the meeting. Although he noted that they’re hoping for a few more leases.
Prairie Wind Energy is proposing to place a 40-turbine wind farm north of Parkers Prairie. The project originated from a small wind project proposed to be built on the properties of the owners of Prairie Wind Energy, according to project information.
“I grew up with all of my neighbors. I went to 4-H with their kids,” Carlson said. Prairie Wind Energy owners want to create a project that will financially help the landowners and lead to a “viable, sustainable” community in Parkers Prairie, he said. Among the benefits are tax revenue going to the county and local government, and lease payments to the land owners, he added.
Concerns raised by the commissioners Tuesday were the impact on aerial spraying of agricultural land, the location of the turbines and the type of turbine used.
Commissioners Lee Rogness focused on the impact it could have on agricultural land and the ability pilots would have to complete aerial spraying. He noted that agriculture is a resource for the county and it shouldn’t be jeopardized in order to bring the resource of wind energy into the county.
“We’re farmers first and foremost,” Carlson said in response.
Prairie Wind Energy is attempting to locate the wind turbines on conservation reserve program land, which is nonproductive land, Carlson said. By using that land, it nearly doubles what the farmer can earn on the land — its “economic development without hurting agriculture,” Carlson said.
Dell Glasner, an independent crop consultant since 1985, said the aerial spraying is used in Parkers Prairie for potatoes, which are typically planted every three years. An alternative to aerial spraying is to ground spraying, which costs less, Glasner noted.
Rogness also questioned whether the proposed turbine locations could be relocated so as to not be in with agricultural land.
Carlson responded that they took into consideration lakes and the proximity to the power grid. In addition to following setback rules for lakes in the area, Prairie Wind Energy took into consideration locating the turbines close to the power grid, he said.
Commissioner Doug Huebsch questioned what the setbacks would be from houses.
“As far away as possible,” Carlson said, adding that they don’t want to put up turbines that would upset the landowner. “We live here, we plan on living here.”
Rogness also questioned what types of turbines and blades will be selected for the wind farm.
Prairie Wind Energy Board member John Ihle said they’ve chosen Nordic 2.5 megawatt turbines. One reason for their choice is that Nordic completes noise testing at different distances away from the turbines, Ihle said.
The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission currently requires the noise level to be at no more than 50 decibel, which is equal to the noise in a library, Ihle said, adding that a noise study has to be completed for the project.
WOULD YOU LIKE TO SHARE THIS STORY?



Comments
The Daily Journal is happy to host community conversations about news and life in Fergus Falls and the surrounding area. As hosts, we expect guests will show respect for each other. That means we don't threaten or defame each other, and we keep conversations free of personal attacks. Those who persist with racist, defamatory or abusive postings risk losing the privilege to post. To post a comment you will need to register. Or, if you're already registered but have not included your true, verifiable identity with your registration, you will need to update your account to include your identity. Effective Dec. 1, 2009, all posts appear with the commenter's true identity, which must be verified by site staff. Those who registered prior to Dec. 1, 2009, should be aware that once you update your information with your true identity, all prior posts under your user name will also indicate your true identity. If you do not wish to link yourself to prior comments, you should register again with a different user name.Posted by StarTownshipFarmer (anonymous) on October 28, 2009 at 9 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Bring on the "produced locally" wind turbine energy. Thumb your nose at foreign imported energy. Given just a little time, wind towers will blend in with the landscape and become just as "normal" as power lines, road-side mail boxes, cell towers, bill boards, water towers, inter-state freeways, homes built on hilltops, lake cabins fifteen feet from the shoreline, and all the rest. Give me a wind tower to look at any day rather than my neighbor's junk yard front lawn. Lets support local energy and local farmers! Go for it.
Posted by fargorunner (Joel Rovang) on October 28, 2009 at 9:47 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The entire wind energy industry is riddled with inaccuracies. The typical 1.5 mw rated wind turbine actually only produces about 11 percent of that on a long-term basis. They are heavily subsidized. When people run the numbers to make the economic case, they use the "rated number" which is an outright lie.
I am very much for domestic energy production, but it cannot be at the expense of the taxpayers when other alternatives are readily available. There is a ton of oil and a ton of natural gas that the good legislators are keeping from us.
In 20 years, the wind towers that they are putting in right now will be rusting hulks on the prairie.
Posted by werty (anonymous) on October 28, 2009 at 12:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Nice blanket statement fargorunner...I suppose you have studied the site and wind speeds to determine your numbers. Obviously wind speed is a critical element in projecting performance (means windy area is better duh), and a potential site's wind speed is measured through wind resource assessing prior to any wind systems construction to ensure it makes sense.
Posted by akmscott (anonymous) on October 28, 2009 at 1:27 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Get pictures of birds now before the country turns on the bird blenders!
Posted by mgdbottled (anonymous) on October 28, 2009 at 5:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Cheap clean energy. We have a couple turning out here. They are majestic. Very cosmetically appealing. I'd like to see them in the water off the shore of Lake Michigan. There's room for zillions of them and they'd just add to the beauty.
PS: the blades turn slow so there's no danger to wildlife.
Posted by BigDawgBig (anonymous) on October 28, 2009 at 11:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Dang, I was hoping to thin out the Geese population :(.
Post a comment (Terms of Use Policy)
(Requires free registration.)
You may also register to comment in our forums at www.fergusfeedback.com.