Print this story | E-mail story | This story has 2 comments Add your own | iPod friendly
MnDOT shifts irresponsibility into overdrive
Published Thursday, November 1, 2007
For over a decade, our state's crumbling highway infrastructure has been the center of heated debate at the legislature and everyone agrees something needs to be done. Unfortunately for the past decade, we have not made meaningful gains or invested real resources in our most basic government functions — such as maintaining our roads and bridges. In many ways, there has been an appalling lack of leadership on the transportation issue.
It seems to be a daily occurrence that we read more news that Governor Pawlenty's Department of Transportation is falling apart and failing us. One day it's that they will run financial deficits, the next the roads haven't met performance standards. Congestion continues to worsen, and the exterior panels on their central office will soon fall to the ground. This department is literally falling apart.
Bottom line, the state needs a better transportation system. We need to invest in economic development and personal safety. We need the Pawlenty administration to join the legislature, who has led in a bipartisan way, for a comprehensive and aggressive transportation plan. We need less spin and more action.
The collapse of the I-35W Bridge not only provided a tragic visual of the failure to act, but also turned the public's attention to the life and death issue of investing in our state and our infrastructure. The bridge collapse was a human tragedy but the financial status of the Department of Transportation is a man-made disaster.
In 2003, Gov. Pawlenty and Lt. Governor Molnau tried to convince us that roads are free and we can just borrow our way to a better transportation system, but four years later, the bill has come due. Pawlenty's follow-up act was to veto (not once— but twice) comprehensive and bipartisan transportation funding packages passed by the legislature.
I'm proud to say I voted against Pawlenty's ill-advised scheme at the time, but unfortunately for our state, the results were foreseen and predictable. As a result, the department is so desperate for cash they are floating creative finance schemes to try and make ends meet.
It is easy to conclude that our Department of Transportation (MnDOT) is flat broke and this administration is fiscally bankrupt. The simple facts are as follows:
n By it's own admission, MnDOT is projected to run multi-million dollar deficits during several months over the next couple of years.
n Project cost over-runs have become commonplace.
n Department interest payments (tax money not going to new projects or road maintenance) have skyrocketed from $5.6 million to $53.7 million in the past 10 years— an increase of 657%!
n Over the past five years, several projects have been canceled or delayed including Highway 100, the Crosstown project, the Devils Triangle, the Wakota Bridge, Hwy. 53, and Highway 19 through Marshall.
n Questionable accounting and unwise cash flow shifts need to be used if no other scheduled projects are to be delayed.
n MnDOT has requested the General Fund float them a loan to cash flow their needs.
n MnDOT's own estimates say we need an additional $2.4 Billion a year for the next 0 years simply to maintain current standards (not make progress on congestion or improve safety).
Sadly, we have shifted from a responsible "pay as you go" model to a "borrow and spend" system. It looks to me like Enron accounting, maxed out credit cards and budgeting by band-aids all at once. Frankly, Minnesota deserves better.
As if this financial mess isn't bad enough for the taxpayers, the Governor has launched into a full-tilt spin cycle. The Governor claims that if the legislative committee doesn't give DOT additional authority, other transportation projects will be delayed. The fact of the matter is that under Pawlenty, MnDOT has a long history of delaying projects long before the bridge collapse (see financial mess outlined above).
Viewing his response to legislators, it's clear Governor Pawlenty is using the awful bridge tragedy as an excuse to delay other projects. In truth, it is the Governor's vetoes and lack of leadership that have delayed these projects. If he honestly didn't want projects delayed, he would sign one of these bipartisan funding bills and recognize his financial shortcomings.
Minnesotans deserve a well-managed government that provides efficient core services— no matter where you live in the state. The legislature has demonstrated that investment in our roads and bridges is not a partisan undertaking. To make statewide progress, we need just a few more leaders to muster up the courage and do what's right for communities, businesses, and families.
By Tony Sertich - House majority leader
Comments
The Daily Journal is happy to host community conversations about news and life in Fergus Falls and the surrounding area. As hosts, we expect guests will show respect for each other. That means we don't threaten or defame each other, and we keep conversations free of personal attacks. Witty is great. Abusive is not. If you think a post violates these standards, don't escalate the situation. Instead, flag the comment to alert us. We'll take action if necessary. It's not hard. This should be a place where people want to read and contribute -- a place for spirited exchanges of opinion. So those who persist with racist, defamatory or abusive postings risk losing the privilege to post at all.Posted by randock (anonymous) on November 5, 2007 at 2 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Mr. Sertich, with his humble hand-wringing and talk of bipartisanship. I don't buy it. To blame the current executive (or legislature for that matter) for the excesses of past government is pure political cynicism. Why doesn't Sertich explain just why we're in financially unsound shape? Could it be years of excessive spending thanks to both DFL and Republicans? No, Sertich can't see past his need to make some political hay.
Posted by kemp6908 (anonymous) on November 5, 2007 at 6:42 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Guess where most all the road money went?? To the light rail system in Mpls.?? Yep!
Post a comment
(Requires free registration.)