Print this story | E-mail story | This story has 9 comments Add your own | iPod friendly

The best $10 spent in a long time

Published Saturday, November 10, 2007

A couple of months ago, I wrote about how pirating music has been taken to a new level, culminating with a huge fine of a Minnesota woman for copying songs on the Internet.

As a person in charge of a business that has been dealing with the problems of everyone expecting to have everything on the Internet for free, I supported the efforts of the record company setting an example of those who download pirated music.

So when it came to the recent experiment by Radiohead, I was all ears (or clicks, as it may be.) The idea was that the band would allow their new CD, “In Rainbow,” to be available to fans by way of the Internet. But rather than ask for a set price, the band instead put a blank space where the price should be. You, the purchaser of the music, were to decide how much the downloaded album was worth to you.

That’s actually a tougher question than it may seem. As I was ready to hit the “download” button, I had to actually ponder what I should put in that spot.

Clearly, many out there left the spot blank, and proceeded to download the CD for free. There were reports that 60 percent of those who downloaded the CD chose to pay nothing, but the band’s publicity person is denying those figures, according to a recent article in MTV magazine.

In my mind, a free download wasn’t right. And it’s not because I felt there were stealing issues involved. I’m a big fan of Radiohead’s music. I admire the fact that they wanted to get their music out to the public in a revolutionary new way, without the help of the big record companies who for years have controlled the careers of artists. Their music has value to me, and they deserve to be paid for it.

On the other hand, there has to be a limit to that value. I decided to check out the cost of a good-old-fashioned CD that you purchase at a record or discount store. Clearly, a regular CD is worth more than a download. You get a nice box, a cover with all of the lyrics on it, and apparently, better sound quality, (though I have a hard time telling the difference.)

The going rate for a brand-new CD these days, it seems, is around $13, which is down about $3 or $4 since the last time I bought a CD. Clearly, the lagging music industry has taken its toll on CD prices. Having the album two months before its release date is worth something, but not having all the goodies that go with a CD reduced the value.

Some argued that you shouldn’t feel the need to pay as much because the already-rich artist gets all the money, and there are no production costs involved. I don’t buy that argument. I am paying for the music, and the artist alone created that music. If the artist can collect all the money, more power to them. There are cases of undeserved wealth far worse than the Radiohead example. Writing good music is a lot tougher than it seems.

So after some wrangling, I decided $10 was a fair price. Of course, because the band is from England, I had to convert dollars to pounds. Taking a stab that one pound was worth about $2, I put “5 pounds” in the blank.

After a couple of days of listening to some great new Radiohead songs, I can honestly say, that $10 (or $10.46, as it turned out) was the best – if unnecessary — $10.46 I have spent in some time.

Joel Myhre is The Journal’s general manager. E-mail him at joel.myhre@fergusfallsjournal.com

Comments

The Daily Journal is happy to host community conversations about news and life in Fergus Falls and the surrounding area. As hosts, we expect guests will show respect for each other. That means we don't threaten or defame each other, and we keep conversations free of personal attacks. Witty is great. Abusive is not. If you think a post violates these standards, don't escalate the situation. Instead, flag the comment to alert us. We'll take action if necessary. It's not hard. This should be a place where people want to read and contribute -- a place for spirited exchanges of opinion. So those who persist with racist, defamatory or abusive postings risk losing the privilege to post at all.

Posted by doctipster (anonymous) on November 10, 2007 at 11:27 a.m. (Suggest removal)

sucker

Posted by toad3 (anonymous) on November 10, 2007 at 1 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I think you should shop local!

Posted by chipmunk (anonymous) on November 10, 2007 at 2:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I vote for toad to be Mayor of Fergus Falls. Good one Toad.

Posted by awelgraven (anonymous) on November 11, 2007 at 12:31 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I don't like Radiohead personally; they're music just never sounded that good to me. But I will say that I did buy the album, because what they're doing is awesome. They're allowing fans to pay for an album that's not crippled by DRM, that's playable on ANY mp3 player (are you listening Apple?), for a price that's reasonable. No threat of a ridiculous lawsuit to make an "example" of somebody. And for the record, the stats show that at an average of $6 per album, the band is making more money that they would on conventional CD sales. Perhaps we'll finally get to stop hearing idiots lecture us on how Britney Spears is going to have to flip burgers to support her drug habit. Radiohead is selling music affordably and without DRM restrictions, yet still making a profit. Are you listening, RIAA?

Posted by Norse (anonymous) on November 11, 2007 at 9:51 a.m. (Suggest removal)

What does (shopping) buying local have to do with a worldwide music purchase? Is there a similar band with similar music available within the city limits of Fergus Falls? What added benefit does buying a CD from Target or Walmart provide to the Fergus Falls Community? After the cost of the items, and the Stipend sent to the Corporate HQ Castles in Arkansas and Minneapolis, how much of that $10 will stay in the local economy? Maybe 25-50cents max to cover some wages. So buy what you want from wherever and contribute 75cents to a community cause and you are doing 'local' the biggest favor, without contributing to the gold inlays at Castle Mart, or Chez Targez.

Posted by chipmunk (anonymous) on November 11, 2007 at 9:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Hey Norse, do you think its just possible that toad was be sarcastic and perhaps a bit cynical?

Posted by toad3 (anonymous) on November 11, 2007 at 10:32 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Chipmunk, you are right on!

Posted by Norse (anonymous) on November 11, 2007 at 11:16 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Still it's a valid point, given that theme that didn't save the small mainstreet business people, it just brought Fargo's Targez and Walmart to the 'local' scene.

Posted by James (anonymous) on November 12, 2007 at 3:39 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Yes, because Target and Walmart have come here directly from Fargo.

Post a comment

(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:



© 2009, Fergus Falls Newspapers, Inc.

Boone Newspapers, Inc. | About us | Subscribe | Printing | E-Edition | Contact us | Advertise with us