Print this story | E-mail story | This story has 7 comments Add your own | iPod friendly
United Way seeks your input
Published Saturday, March 22, 2008
As many are probably aware, one of the most popular features on the The Fergus Falls Daily Journal’s web site has been the ability for readers to comment on stories. Our readership statistics show that, clearly, the feature is drawing readership and participation like we have never done before.
I admit that many of those comments make me stand up in my chair, and question whether we should continue the practice of allowing comments or not.
However, in the case of this column, I will be keenly interested in what our readers have to say.
Several months ago, I wrote a column as president of the United Way about how the Imagination Library was going to run out of funding soon. The Imagination Library provided one book per month to about 1,800 children from birth to 5 in Otter Tail County. There were no restrictions as to income levels; any child could participate.
As I talked about then, my daughter was in the program, and immensely enjoyed the books she received.
The program lasted about a year thanks to donations from the Thomas Stringer and Emily Johnson memorials, and a one-time donation from the United Way.
However, at an estimated $48,000 per year — $27 per child per year, 1,800 children — the funding ran out after about a year. And while the United Way staff have continued to work to find other funding sources, $48,000 per year, every year indefinitely is a big, big chunk.
After a recent meeting, the United Way board has been pondering what looks to be the only option: using a large portion of the United Way funds that typically go to local non-profits, and continue the Imagination Library.
If donations to The United Way of Otter Tail County were growing, funding the Imagination Library would not be an issue. The reality is, donations have been stagnant. The United Way of Otter Tail County has raised about the same amount of money, within $5,000 to $10,000, every year for the past seven or eight years. This year, in fact, unless significant donations come in before the end of the month, funding levels will fall below the average.
I have thought about the idea of restarting the program, and only allowing children whose parents fall below a certain income level to participate. However, the national Imagination Library organization does not allow such guidelines.
So here’s the choice: fund the Imagination Library, and significantly reduce or cut altogether funding from many of the programs the United Way has been funding for many years, or don’t fund the Imagination Library.
It’s not an easy choice. The programs the United Way funds all have merit, from the Salvation Army to the Food Shelf to Meals on Wheels to Someplace Safe to A Place to Belong. Cutting funding from those programs would impact people in need in our area.
But the question is, what will the impact be of not getting books to children? Certainly, literacy among children is important. Is it important enough that it should take higher priority over other needs?
The other factor is, will the presence of the Imagination Library convince you, the local resident, to give more to the United Way? Or will the fact that the United Way cuts funding to other worthy non-profit anger you enough to give less?
These are questions that the United Way Board is grappling with. I certainly am. There’s no correct answer. And while it would be nice if there weren’t losers, there will be.
Please let us know. Write letters, comment on this column, talk with United Way board members. We really, truly want to know what you think.
Joel Myhre is The Journal’s general manager. E-mail him at joel.myhre@fergusfallsjournal.com
Comments
The Daily Journal is happy to host community conversations about news and life in Fergus Falls and the surrounding area. As hosts, we expect guests will show respect for each other. That means we don't threaten or defame each other, and we keep conversations free of personal attacks. Witty is great. Abusive is not. If you think a post violates these standards, don't escalate the situation. Instead, flag the comment to alert us. We'll take action if necessary. It's not hard. This should be a place where people want to read and contribute -- a place for spirited exchanges of opinion. So those who persist with racist, defamatory or abusive postings risk losing the privilege to post at all.Posted by chipmunk (anonymous) on March 22, 2008 at 10:20 a.m. (Suggest removal)
If readers comments make you stand up in your chair, why not do something about it. Instead of allowing anonymous comments from any crank with a phony email address make everyone start over. Make anyone who wishes to post comments reregister with a valid email address, one from prtel or some other legitimate internet service provider, not gmail or yahoo. If I person has internet service it costs no more to have a real email address. Then allow user names but also display the persons real name next to it. The registration process should include a verifiable phone number and street address that someone at the journal can check for accuracy before assigning a username and pass word. Finally publish a set of rules for posters that are clear and concise, not some arbitrary and capricious rules known only to the editor and subject to his daily whims and the objections of your advertisers. Words like “objectionable” should not be in the rules because it is subject to interpretation. What is objectionable to one person is the truth to another, and there would be less stupid, objectionable, illiterate, inane, comments if each poster knows that his name will appear next to his post for all to see. You would no doubt have fewer posters, but the content of those who do post should be given more weight.
Posted by chipmunk (anonymous) on March 22, 2008 at 11:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)
One more thing, someone from the journal should personally call the phone number given during the registration process to speak to the person requesting a username and password to verify that it is indeed a real person.
Posted by oh_its_you (anonymous) on March 22, 2008 at 11:06 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Then when you are done with all of that, please also let us know what to think and what to say, we are not quite capable enough to be entrusted with free speech or having a mind of our own...anonyminity is overrated...GEORGE ORWELL FOR PRESIDENT!
Posted by Vampire (anonymous) on March 22, 2008 at 11:30 a.m. (Suggest removal)
oh_its_you, what does your post mean? Who are you speaking to? Your post seems contradictory.
Posted by Mel (anonymous) on March 24, 2008 at 9:21 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Anonyminity is great. Who whould want to get personal phone calls, from who knows who, after a comment to the web site? However I have thought it would be fun to meet a few of the posters, like chipmunk for one. As far as a real name, I think the Journal got my name and email address when I signed up. If I were to write something that was very bad, I think they would be able to find me.
I have wondered why some of the comments were deleted on this site, when to me they were quite mild (except perhaps for personal insults, when names were spelled out).
Posted by chipmunk (anonymous) on March 24, 2008 at 10:12 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Mel you are correct the FFDJ has your email address and name. But only because you were honest when you signed up. Too many of the posters here used a phony name with an untraceable email address through yahoo or gmail. Neither of these services check any information when applying for an account.
Posted by lenny (anonymous) on March 24, 2008 at 10:54 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Why don't you ask why people don't give to the United Way and then leave their post up after they answer. You might learn something.
Post a comment
(Requires free registration.)