Print this story | E-mail story | This story has 7 comments Add your own | iPod friendly

Council deems dog dangerous

Published Monday, July 21, 2008

A Fergus Falls dog owner says the high cost of pet insurance will force him to put down his animal, a cocker spaniel named Patch that bit both a postal carrier and a police officer in late June.

Members of the Fergus Falls city council declared Patch a dangerous dog following testimony from owner Kristian Kristiansen during a public hearing Monday. Council members also heard from Tom Thomas, a postman who said he was delivering mail along South Mabelle Avenue June 23 when Kristiansen’s dog ran across a neighboring yard, biting him on the upper calf and leaving a puncture wound that remains sensitive to this day. Officer Nathan Lien, who was bitten by the dog while investigating the incident later in the day, also spoke.

At Monday’s hearing, Kristiansen had the opportunity to defend his animal and tell his side of the story.

“That dog is not a dangerous dog,” he said, explaining he’d purchased the dog as a guard dog for Sandra Denbrook, the homeowner at 1130 South Mabelle where Kristiansen was present when Patch ran through an open door and bit the officer. Patch gets excited when he gets aggravated, Kristiansen said, but he’s more a barker than a biter.

According to Kristiansen, Patch’s bite to Thomas wasn’t as bad as the postman claims. Kristiansen said he asked Thomas about his condition following the bite and offered to get first aid materials, but was told “No, no, it’s just a little nip.”

Kristiansen also claimed he’s been the victim of harassment by Fergus Falls police on multiple occasions, and said Patch bit Lien because the officer stomped up the front steps of Denbrooks’s residence, pounded on the door and shouted inside. Kristiansen likened the delivery of a Notice of Dangerous Dog or Dangerous Animal and the seizure of Patch several days later to “a Gestapo raid,” involving at least nine police officers.

“Does that look like overkill?” Kristiansen asked the council. “It does to me.”

Yet council members found Patch dangerous on the basis that the dog had 1) caused bodily injury or disfigurement to any person on public or private property, and 2) bit one or more persons on two or more occasions. The council did not move to have the animal destroyed, but agreed that in order to have Patch released from the Otter Tail County Humane Society, Kristiansen must provide an enclosure for the animal, use a muzzle and leash on the animal when outside the enclosure, post warning signs on his property, and purchase a minimum of $300,000 liability insurance.

The last measure, Kristiansen said, he simply could not comply with.

“I can’t afford what you guys are asking of me,” he said, explaining he is on Social Security and will take the dog to be put down outside the city. “I’ll take him up to Park Rapids and bury him there.”

Before that happens, Kristiansen said he would like to keep the dog alive long enough so that the judge in a September criminal case regarding the bites can see the animal for himself. Whether the judge will extend Patch’s stay at the humane society until that time remains undetermined.

Comments

The Daily Journal is happy to host community conversations about news and life in Fergus Falls and the surrounding area. As hosts, we expect guests will show respect for each other. That means we don't threaten or defame each other, and we keep conversations free of personal attacks. Witty is great. Abusive is not. If you think a post violates these standards, don't escalate the situation. Instead, flag the comment to alert us. We'll take action if necessary. It's not hard. This should be a place where people want to read and contribute -- a place for spirited exchanges of opinion. So those who persist with racist, defamatory or abusive postings risk losing the privilege to post at all.

Posted by Sumwun (anonymous) on July 21, 2008 at 9:52 p.m. (Suggest removal)

9 police officers in a gestapo raid?? Come on Kristian. This town maybe has half that many cops working at one time. And to fetch a dog? Maybe you can massage your story a little bit more to make yourself sound like more of a victim the next time the Journal quotes you. Buy a leash.

Posted by Geo (anonymous) on July 22, 2008 at 8:05 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I think we forget about our responsibilities as thinking, rational human beings. This isn't about the owner or the dog it is about protecting other innocent people. As a thinking human being you need to get past the point it is pet and remember it is an animal that obviously has a tendency to bite. I have been there and after my cocker spaniel "nipped" me for the second time I put it to sleep. It is not worth the price of someone getting hurt and possibly disfigured

Posted by Generally_Misunderstood (anonymous) on July 22, 2008 at 9:23 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Can this guy milk the sympathy card any more? Your pet bit someone, be man enough to take the responsibility of pet ownership.

I wonder if the "9" officers were in full S.W.A.T. regalia. Oh great, now I have "Bad boys, bad boys... whatcha gunna do... whatcha gunna do when d'ey come for you" in my head for the rest of the day!

Posted by frankenfurter (anonymous) on July 22, 2008 at 9:39 a.m.

(This comment was removed by the site staff.)

Posted by fergusfallsmom (anonymous) on July 22, 2008 at 9:52 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I do not think the City's requests were over the top what so ever. I think they were quite generous to allow the animal to live but under conditions.

Posted by daidres (anonymous) on July 22, 2008 at 9:57 a.m. (Suggest removal)

We put our dog down almost a year ago for biting our uncle, although it seemed to be brought on, he was still a timid acting dog, and living in town we weren't taking any chances of him biting a kid. Teased or not, no animal should bite. Same as a human, no human has the right to hit anyone if picked on. I do feel for the owner and the animal, as it tugs at the heart strings to have to put a beloved pet down. No one will understand his situation until you have been in one yourself.

Posted by checkyourfacts (anonymous) on July 22, 2008 at 1:58 p.m. (Suggest removal)

he doesn't own that home outside of town

Post a comment

(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:



© 2008, Fergus Falls Newspapers, Inc.

Boone Newspapers, Inc. | About us | Subscribe | Printing | E-Edition | Contact us | Advertise with us