Print this story | E-mail story | This story has 3 comments Add your own | iPod friendly
Changes in tax laws could affect farm lands
Published Wednesday, September 10, 2008
Mosher
Minnesota legislation pertaining to property taxes, signed into law this year, will affect many taxpayers in Otter Tail County. That's the word from County Assessor Bob Moe who addressed the county board of commissioners Tuesday morning.
One bill, known as the Green Acres property tax law, pertains to
nonproductive acres such as sloughs, woodland and wetlands that are not used for agricultural production. Those acres no longer will be eligible for the reduced agricultural valuation and property tax deferment provided by Green Acres.
Another program enacted in 2008 will provide honorably discharged disabled Minnesota veterans with some, if not all, of their property taxes forgiven — beginning in 2009. Qualifying veterans must have the proper paperwork filed with their county assessor's office.
"As for the Green Acres program, owners of non-productive acres that are currently receiving Green Acres benefits have two options," Moe said. "Non-productive acres currently in the program may be withdrawn from the program or they may remain until any part of the land is sold, transferred or subdivided."
Moe said that land that’s withdrawn will be subject to a payback of deferred taxes.
If owners notify the county assessor's office of their intent to withdraw some or all of the acres on or before Jan. 2, 2009, the assessor will estimate the three-year payback amount and notify the owner of that amount in the summer of 2009. The final determination to withdraw or not can be made by the property owner at that time.
If the owner decides to withdraw all or part of the land, the tax would then be payable in November 2009.
If any portion of the non-productive property currently enrolled in the Green Acres is withdrawn, sold, transferred or subdivided after Jan. 2, 2009, the non-productive land must be removed from the program.
It will then be subject to the new payback of up to seven years of deferred taxes.
County assessors such as Moe will send letters to inform landowners that are currently enrolled in Green Acres about the options available under the new legislation. The letters for affected property owners in Otter Tail County will be sent in about one week.
Veterans with 70 percent disability or higher will have up to $150,000
excluded from the annual market value of their homestead property. Those with a 100 percent permanent disability rating will receive up to $300,000
exclusion.
"I'm fully in support of tax relief for disabled veterans," county board member Dennis Mosher said Tuesday. "However, in order to meet county budgets, this difference will need to be borne by other taxpayers. We as a commission have no other choice."
County board chairman Sydney Nelson agreed.
Said Moe, "When you change how someone gets taxed, there's a shift to
someone else. Overall, with both of these programs (Green Acres and vet
disability tax relief) we don't know the specifics on how this will fully affect us here in Otter Tail County until all of the changes are entered and calculated."
A property must be the homestead of a qualified disabled veteran in order to receive this value exclusion.
To qualify, a veteran must have been honorably discharged from the United States armed forces as indicated by United States Government Form DD214 or other official military discharge papers. There also must be certification of the veteran by the United States Veterans Administration as having a service-connected disability that meets the requirements of this new law.
In the case of agricultural homesteads, only the house, garage, and
immediately surrounding one acre of land will qualify for the exclusion. If a property qualifies for this market value exclusion, the property does not receive the residential homestead market value credit provided under Minnesota Statute 273.1384, subdivision 1.
Comments
The Daily Journal is happy to host community conversations about news and life in Fergus Falls and the surrounding area. As hosts, we expect guests will show respect for each other. That means we don't threaten or defame each other, and we keep conversations free of personal attacks. Witty is great. Abusive is not. If you think a post violates these standards, don't escalate the situation. Instead, flag the comment to alert us. We'll take action if necessary. It's not hard. This should be a place where people want to read and contribute -- a place for spirited exchanges of opinion. So those who persist with racist, defamatory or abusive postings risk losing the privilege to post at all.Posted by goingfishing (anonymous) on September 10, 2008 at 3:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)
It sounds to me like Mosher does not consider the fact that if the county has less income they could reduce the amount they budget and spend. They would rather continue spending money on things that are not really necessary. IE: The Sherriff's office in Otter Tail, the Government Service Center, and the soon to be remodeling of the Court House. This county just treats the tax payers like an open checkbook and I'm tired of it.
Posted by potatosup (anonymous) on September 10, 2008 at 4:46 p.m. (Suggest removal)
At the very beginning of the article it says "Minnesota Legilation". This was a state decision that greatly affects Otter Tail county.
Posted by goingfishing (anonymous) on September 11, 2008 at 11:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)
My point was meant to be simple. If the county received less taxes, they should spend less, not just shift the tax income to other people in order to keep up their fat cat spending ways. If you receive less income you have to spend less and the county should be no different.
Post a comment
(Requires free registration.)