Print this story | E-mail story | This story has 11 comments Add your own | iPod friendly

Vote Yes Express rolls into Fergus Falls

Published Thursday, October 23, 2008

Backers of amending the Minnesota constitution to include a dedicated funding provision to provide money to protect hunting and fishing habitats, and other projects, are urging fellow Minnesotans to vote yes. Also benefiting would be water sources, parks and trails and the state's arts and cultural heritage.

To accomplish this, the yes vote will be needed on Nov. 4 when Minnesota voters will decide whether to raise the state sales tax. The sales tax increase of three eighths of one percent would generate an estimated $300 million a year.

“The fractional increase in the sales tax would add only four cents to a $10 purchase,” said Ken Martin, part of a delegation traveling through Minnesota Wednesday in a Vote Yes Express van. “Vote yes so that your children and grandchildren can continue to benefit from Minnesota’s quality of life.”

He said that 40 percent of Minnesota’s tested waters are polluted, failing to meet health standards.

Tony Rondeau of Fergus Falls, an active outdoorsman, wore a shirt with the words, “Vote Yes. Protect the Minnesota You Love.”

Another proponent, Les Bensch of Ashby, said the amendment had almost universal support at this year’s Fergus Falls Ducks Unlimited banquet. He said that groups representing hunters, anglers, environmentalists and various arts advocates are campaigning to win voter support for this constitutional amendment.

Wednesday’s press conference, moved to The Daily Journal from outdoors at the Prairie Wetlands Learning Center due to rain, was attended by Maxine Adams, executive director of the Lake Region Arts Council, Fergus Falls, and others.

“Passage of this amendment also is of critical importance to us who represent the arts across Minnesota,” she said.

Sheila Smith of MInnesota Citizens for the Arts, said, “I know what a positive impact this amendment will have right here, in Fergus Falls and throughout Otter Tail County. You have great arts communities in this area of Minnesota.”

Martin, from Minneapolis and spokesperson for the Vote Yes Express, said funding support from lottery proceeds do not go far enough to help protect the outdoors and other facets of Minnesota’s quality of life that would benefit from a yes vote.

Knowing of an anti-tax increase point of view, he again said that the modest support of four cents for a $10 purchase would benefit all Minnesotans.

“We call ourselves the state of sky-blue waters,” said Martin. “Let’s work to keep it that way. Here in Otter Tail County, we’re pleased to have the support of hunters, fishermen, environmentalists and various arts advocates.”

Members of the Vote Yes Express said Wednesday that the amendment has the support of Republicans, Democrats and Independents. Also supporting the amendment are U.S. Senators Norm Coleman and Amy Klobuchar as well as Congressman Collin Peterson.

If the amendment is approved by state voters in November, about 81 percent of the funds will go to the outdoors and 19 percent to the arts.

Hundreds of sportsmen’s clubs such as Fergus Falls Ducks Unlimited, if the amendment passes, will have their banquet dollars matched by this funding package that’s on the Nov. 4 ballot.

Martin said that on election day Minnesotans will have the choice to invest in the things they need — clean water, wildlife habitat, lakes and rivers, parks and the arts. But not voting would be the same as a no vote, he said.

“Passage of dedicated funding is vital to the guarantee of a stable and long-term funding source,” he said. “A yes vote passage is important to all Minnesotans.”

Comments

The Daily Journal is happy to host community conversations about news and life in Fergus Falls and the surrounding area. As hosts, we expect guests will show respect for each other. That means we don't threaten or defame each other, and we keep conversations free of personal attacks. Witty is great. Abusive is not. If you think a post violates these standards, don't escalate the situation. Instead, flag the comment to alert us. We'll take action if necessary. It's not hard. This should be a place where people want to read and contribute -- a place for spirited exchanges of opinion. So those who persist with racist, defamatory or abusive postings risk losing the privilege to post at all.

Posted by cascade (anonymous) on October 23, 2008 at 12:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Great - more taxes. Sure it only four cents on a ten dollar purchase, but when will it end? Nickel, dime, quarter, half of your pay... I'm all for clean water and what-not, but doesn't this set a dangerous precedent?

Posted by FergusFamily (anonymous) on October 23, 2008 at 12:38 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I agree - Vote Yes! It's a fact that our legislators should be taking care of these priorities from the general fund. But they aren't. This dedicated source of funds means things like education don't have our natural environment and arts to compete with for money. Our natural environment IS Minnesota. Let's keep it that way.

Posted by BeaverFan (anonymous) on October 23, 2008 at 1:14 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Vote Yes to the environment and clean water...but not with a tax increase. Wasnt the MN State Lottery set up for this very reason? Aren't the profits from the lottery system going to this fund already? If the issue is that important its time we hold our elected official accountable for ensuring the health of our environment with the taxes we already pay. Enough is enough.

Posted by rodentboy (anonymous) on October 23, 2008 at 1:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)

so if the goverment is screwing up with our money that's ok and give them more to see if they can get it right?

Posted by misadventurer (anonymous) on October 23, 2008 at 2:16 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Bullseye BeaverFan! To amend the constitution in order to produce funds for such a limited focus is dangerous. If the environment is important enough to divert funds to, and I am a firm believer that it is, our lawmakers need to be the ones to take aim for all of us.

Posted by Callie25 (anonymous) on October 23, 2008 at 2:24 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Please please please vote NO. I wish the Journal wasn't so biased on this issue. A constitutional amendment is very very dangerous. It is correct as well that the lottery was set up to pay for environmental concerns. The arts are something that should be supported by private donations.

Posted by metasonics (anonymous) on October 23, 2008 at 4:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)

anyone remember what Robert Mapplethorpe's pal Andres Serrano did with his public funds?
see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piss_Christ...

I fully agree with Callie25 on this issue!
A constitutional amendment? to condone failure and mismanagement?
instead lets vote the supporters out!

Jamie Cooper

Posted by thetruthhurts (anonymous) on October 23, 2008 at 11:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)

VOTE NO!!! They already get more then enough of our hard earned bucks, if they can't figure out how to manage the money they already extort in taxes, why give them more?

Posted by bornhere (anonymous) on October 24, 2008 at 12:23 a.m. (Suggest removal)

vote YES. Otter Tail County gets huge revenues from tourism due to our natural and protected environment. It is an investment in our future.

Posted by Blitzen (anonymous) on October 24, 2008 at 10:08 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I am a huge hunter/fisherperson/outdoors lover who is voting no. To do this on an amendment is a slippery slope

Posted by Granny (anonymous) on October 24, 2008 at 11:21 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Husband voting yes, I am voting No.
I do not believe we as tax payers need to support this.
We have the Lotterie and it should have already been taken care of by the gov. prior to the Lotterie.
Callie 25 I agree 100%. Thank you

Post a comment

(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:



© 2009, Fergus Falls Newspapers, Inc.

Boone Newspapers, Inc. | About us | Subscribe | Printing | E-Edition | Contact us | Advertise with us